You have no idea what it costs to run Canada's heathcare system, let alone the world's.
I don't really give a shit what you think I know or don't know, but fuck it, I'll humour you. Keep in mind that the cost to influence and corrupt an institution is less than the cost to run it, but just for fun let's look at BC's 2024/2025 financial summary and extrapolate from there. Their estimate for 2023/24 is around 28.6B in operating expenses.
Now let's look at Pfizer. No, not at their historical corruption lawsuits, let's just focus on their financials.
Full-year 2023 revenues were $58.5 billion, reflecting a 41% operational decline due primarily to the expected decline in COVID-19 revenues, while fourth-quarter revenues were $14.2 billion, reflecting a 42% operational decline.
Putting aside the fact that this ONE pharmaceutical company made nearly double in REVENUE what a socialistic province's government SPENT the whole year, I draw your attention to the one thing you never seem to be able to see - the elephant in the room - which is that an estimated 41% of this mega corporation's earnings were cut off when demand for the COVID-19 fake vaccines and related products tapered off. I know you're the type of person who needs everything spelled out but I won't even bother because I can't even pity someone as aggressively and persistently stupid as you. Wallow in ignorance, fool.
One weak attempt to support her claim that healthcare is a "profession paid for by pharmaceutical companies", folks, and then she folds at the first rebuttal.
This is how tuchodi's mind works. I say "profession paid for by pharmaceutical companies" and tuchodi hears "profession paid for entirely by pharmaceutical companies" and so follows their insane rebuttal to a point I never made. Tuchodi, you are a dishonest shill who clearly has no concern regarding the truth and no concept of balance or nuance.
I don't really give a shit what you think I know or don't know, but fuck it, I'll humour you. Keep in mind that the cost to influence and corrupt an institution is less than the cost to run it, but just for fun let's look at BC's 2024/2025 financial summary and extrapolate from there. Their estimate for 2023/24 is around 28.6B in operating expenses.
Now let's look at Pfizer. No, not at their historical corruption lawsuits, let's just focus on their financials.
Putting aside the fact that this ONE pharmaceutical company made nearly double in REVENUE what a socialistic province's government SPENT the whole year, I draw your attention to the one thing you never seem to be able to see - the elephant in the room - which is that an estimated 41% of this mega corporation's earnings were cut off when demand for the COVID-19 fake vaccines and related products tapered off. I know you're the type of person who needs everything spelled out but I won't even bother because I can't even pity someone as aggressively and persistently stupid as you. Wallow in ignorance, fool.
She's putting the gross income - not the net income - of a global corporation up against the healthcare spending of 0.07% of the global population.
And she's ignoring the actual cost of running the corporations. She's pretending that Pfizer has that whole $58.5B to spend on influencing healthcare.
Seems legit, eh folks?
Is this her attempt to back up her claim that healthcare is a "profession paid for by pharmaceutical companies"?
If so she'll need to produce almost 1500 more pharmaceutical companies the size of Pfizer and continue to ignore their operating costs.
Let's see her do that.
You’re literally too stupid to argue with, grasping at straws and rebutting points that nobody made other than your mentally ill self.
One weak attempt to support her claim that healthcare is a "profession paid for by pharmaceutical companies", folks, and then she folds at the first rebuttal.
This is how tuchodi's mind works. I say "profession paid for by pharmaceutical companies" and tuchodi hears "profession paid for entirely by pharmaceutical companies" and so follows their insane rebuttal to a point I never made. Tuchodi, you are a dishonest shill who clearly has no concern regarding the truth and no concept of balance or nuance.