This makes more sense to me because antisemitism is already covered by "no racism" but we all know leftists who browse this board think that you can't be racist against white people so we need to specify no antiwhiteness for the leftists.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
The problem is "racism" could mean anything. "Anti-whiteness" is more clear, but it gives preference to a group. I don't think ANY group should be given preference or protection by the rules. It has the potential to turn this place into a leftist site. It's how it's happened everywhere.
Giving preferential treatment and protections to certain groups is what got us all into this mess. Why can't we be adults and just discuss things?
I agree that in reality we should drop the "no racism" rule altogether but at least No racism/antiwhiteness is pretty clear on the meaning for the current day situation of racism. No one of any political ideology could mistake the intention, though intention doesn't mean there won't be disagreements on what exactly racism is and is not; however, if we only specify no racism and don't include no antiwhiteness then for people on the left side of the political spectrum the rules are much less clear cut.