0
jubyeonin 0 points ago +2 / -2

The mask comes off. I had a feeling this was a honeypot you lefties were trying to use. Your "boogaloo" thing failed. No one is as controntational as you guys and you can't resist virtue signaling.

0
jubyeonin 0 points ago +1 / -1

What was the nature of the assault? Maybe knocking over some product before walking out? Did he actually try to harm anyone?

If he didn't actually assault anyone, going to his house to arrest him is excessive. If he even tried to use his guns is also unclear, but I feel like we would be told he did if there was any real indication that he maybe did.

8
jubyeonin 8 points ago +8 / -0

They do at the American BLM insurrections. In CHAZ, they shook down people for money and had a "speech" where all the white people were supposed to give a black person $10. Those fools actually did it.

4
jubyeonin 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're happy now, but the global depression will hit them and it will be their fault.

4
jubyeonin 4 points ago +4 / -0

The administration needs to cut them off the additional funding. If they can produce a dozen cases on a single person, they get tens of thousands for that person, and they are. Now, they're also talking about the test picking up ANY coronavirus, which will lead to Fauci's narrative that it spreads through everyone quickly.

This is what the media in the entire world is using to push a scare. 5 or so leftist governors in the US killed a third of the people who are said to have died of this virus.

We know the lesson from welfare. If you give these people a lot of money for it, they will abuse the system and keep the money flowing to them. Cut off the funding.

0
jubyeonin 0 points ago +2 / -2

You realize you're talking like an SJW NPC? You're refusing to talk and claim that someone is trying to trick you for having a conversation.

0
jubyeonin 0 points ago +2 / -2

You can address what we're saying. On your side, it's just been "I decide how it is by my own rules and all you guys have to go by is these unclear rules because 1488." You've also implied that this community will become something awful because the base isn't strong.

0
jubyeonin 0 points ago +3 / -3

No, and that's the whole point of this conversation. I'm not the only one who thinks that.

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Soy acts as estrogen in the body. So does BPA. That is for the ignorant or the unwilling. Soy is a filler in a lot of foods and BPA is in most plastic packaging like frozen dinners and plastic bottle drinks.

Their bigger efforts are in training people to want it. If they can get most of the population to accept that gender is fluid, they will have a mostly sterile population that refuses to start a family. People born into Clown World who see everything is wrong will be more easily identified and "re-educated". Their neighbors and families will turn them in.

8
jubyeonin 8 points ago +8 / -0

The globalists are conducting experiments and molding children everywhere. In the US, a boy in juvenile detention was given estrogen without his consent or the knowledge or consent of his parents, so they filed a lawsuit. The estrogen was given to him to control his behavior in their experiment.

7
jubyeonin 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was expecting a bunch of "uh" floating around.

9
jubyeonin 9 points ago +9 / -0

I feel bad for this man. He built a successful business from the US to Canada and had it all taken away when he made a mistake and said a word in a hypothetical. He was one of the first victims of the modern cancel culture.

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've been doing it for a long time now, but their voices have been amplified by the recent actions they have taken. That's why I think it's important to discuss these things and exchange knowledge. We can't do that under censorship. That's why the left prefers it. They give protections to groups through all sorts of rules and convince us that what some people have witnessed radicals saying is simply not true and is an attack on race, culture, religion, or any ideology.

A good example is the ban of Alex Jones and InfoWars. Was he right or wrong? People who never listened to him don't know and by default go with what the establishment says. The establishment says he's wrong, he's promoting false ideas and conspiracy theories, he's right-wing, he's far right, he's dangerous, and if you even touch upon ANY of those things, then you are just as bad as him.

Why can we hear what Alex Jones says and decide for ourselves if he's wrong, half-right, completely right, good, evil, or whatever? If we can't have that kind of discussion, then it comes down to whatever the establishment wants us to believe whenever they want us to believe it.

-2
jubyeonin -2 points ago +2 / -4

It doesn't really clarify it. It adds to what your definition of "racism" is and your definition is not clear, nor is it a universal one.

Different community, dude. Reddit users are mostly far left. They had easy access to the subreddit because they already had the account. It's not the same as here.

You can say that all you want, but it means nothing. You're not even addressing what I said.

-3
jubyeonin -3 points ago +3 / -6

That's a horrible response and one I'd expect from a far leftist like spez.

Why would "anti-semitism" need a distinction and "anti-whiteness" does not?

The community can deal with "muh 1488ers" and false flags. Are you going to mod them? Are you going to stick their posts? How about you don't help them

Censorship is where the far left thrives. The fear of engaging anyone is how globalism got to spread so quickly in the past few decades.

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Makes jihad a lot easier, paving the way for sharia.

7
jubyeonin 7 points ago +8 / -1

Only wear a body cam when you confront a black person. Delete the footage if it is unfavorable to the narrative. Other than that, cameras are racist. Are you following along?

Anyway, at the side it shows they are doing this in favor of sharia as well.

3
jubyeonin 3 points ago +6 / -3

The problem is "racism" could mean anything. "Anti-whiteness" is more clear, but it gives preference to a group. I don't think ANY group should be given preference or protection by the rules. It has the potential to turn this place into a leftist site. It's how it's happened everywhere.

Giving preferential treatment and protections to certain groups is what got us all into this mess. Why can't we be adults and just discuss things?

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

BUT WHAT ABOUT MY GRANDMA?! Oh, the government sent sick people to both my grandmas' nursing homes and they died... WHAT ABOUT OTHER GRANDMAS?!

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reminder "covid" is the CCP/WHO designation. It should be called almost anything except that.

Also, there is a save feature that helps for saving information like this to bring up later, especially when someone in public says "prove it!"

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been saying "WTF" for years now. I guess I was ahead of the curve?

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's informally banned pretty much everywhere. I don't see it in the r/metacanada rules, but Reddit didn't like them. Twitter doesn't like them either and it's a quick way to get banned.

view more: Next ›