28
posted ago by PatriotLove ago by PatriotLove +30 / -2

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article - "Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza."

https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/covid-19-faq.html#cloth-face-coverings - "Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration."

I'm beginning to think the push to wear the mask is a double bluff intended to keep the "virus" around and propagating, so to keep ramming "postive cases" down our throats, despite the dearth in illness and deaths.

This doctor got a shock when in med scchool he read a 1981 study on mask wearing during surgery, that concluded:

“It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”

I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise...

Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”

Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”

Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.

In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.

A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that **“The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgic

https://fortune.com/2020/07/29/no-point-in-wearing-mask-sweden-covid/

World's Top Epidemiologists - Masks Don't Work! "Face masks in public places are not necessary, based on all the current evidence... There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact." - https://www.zerohedge.com/political/worlds-top-epidemiologists-masks-dont-work

https://truepundit.com/there-is-no-proven-effectiveness-netherlands-refuses-to-mandate-mask-wearing-in-public/

https://web.archive.org/web/20200526130951/https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/coronavirus-why-masks-dont-work/ar-BB11nxm9

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/08/03/no-direct-evidence-masks-prevent-viral-infection.aspx

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372?query=recirc_mostViewed_railB_article&fbclid=IwAR0bV1_DlAiei-elMvcMFIDnW6596Sva2aQJUrgZuN0zaptPQ6CO6ZynR2k

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hypothesis-face-mask-induced-o2-depletion-and-co2-enrichment-elicit-fear-and-anxi

https://nypost.com/2020/08/05/mask-mouth-is-a-seriously-stinky-side-effect-of-wearing-masks/