2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well it's actually AIDs.

AIDs is an auto inflammatory condition.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoinflammatory_diseases

The other terms like "VAIDS" sometimes feel like they are created by fact checkers/bad actors as ear worms to use to discredit anyone who presents alternative research.

3
Anither 3 points ago +3 / -0

We are dealing with the 80-20 rule. Communism is very attractive to people with no skills and only survive off the efforts of others.

Sadly that is 80% of the Canadian voting population. The others are busy working to feed the freeloaders.

5
Anither 5 points ago +5 / -0

Most serious is the protein generation.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376265782_Ribosomal_frameshifting_and_misreading_of_mRNA_in_COVID-19_vaccines_produces_off-target_proteins_and_immune_responses_eliciting_safety_concerns_Comment_on_UK_study_by_Mulroney_et_al

When the ribosome is confronted with a string of these modified bases called N1-methylpseudouridine in the mRNA, it slips around 10% of the time causing the mRNA to be misread and unintended proteins to be produced – enough to trigger an immune response>

The finding that unintended proteins may be produced as a result of vaccination is sufficient cause for regulators to conduct full risk assessments of past or future harms that may have ensued. We note that regulators have previously failed to insist on the study and assessment of risk of the pharmacology and toxicology of novel spike protein heterotrimers forming after injection of the bivalent COVID-19 modRNA vaccines.

That can cause many serious issues like cancers which you wouldn't like to share.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it was more eloquently spoken when Karl Marx paraphrased it.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you complain about or "shoot the messenger" isn't that an "ad hominim" attack? A form of misinformation?

I think Bill C-11 is criticised for addressing it in that term. https://catalyst.independent.org/2023/01/06/dark-side-of-bill-c-11-canadian-voices/

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember reading about that guy who wrote the book that became the musical and film "Cabaret" (which about the1930s weimar period) used to travel to Germany from the UK for cheap starving male children to "engage" with in the later 1920s and early 30's (book is set in the time from just after hyperinflation in 1925 and 1931).

The hyperinflation of the 1920s lead to much hardship in Germany which inevitably led to the sins of Weimar:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic

The left celebrated it because the writer took his roommate for an abortion to show how unfair illegal abortion was. The people in the film were "adultified" generally since much prostitution took advantage of the poor children as it often does.

he had moved to Berlin in order to avail himself of boy prostitutes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodbye_to_Berlin

Looks like history is bouncing around again.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

You got any links for those or are you just making it up.

Why would an eco terrorist be "alt right". It makes about as much sense as sending out eco terrorist to burn a forest down and having them claim to be alt right to false flag it. They try to discredit the people trying to stop them.

In reality the simplest answer is the right one. Leftists are the mentally deranged psychopaths that burn down forests in the name of saving them by proving their climate change fantasies are real. The climate change leftists are well known to do that in the states and Washington and California lost billions in homes and countless lives catering to their insanity.

https://apnews.com/article/california-deadly-forest-fire-arson-arrest-a134175f355c70edf906d5ec3209f58c

It's always leftists:

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/democrat-donor-arrested-for-starting-massive-fire-democrats-blamed-on-climate-change/

How do they get their marching orders?

The RCMP are still after other eco terrorist folks that started all the other fires as the article states. The uncomfortable reality is that the leads are possibly pointing to people they don't want to expose so they are slow rolling them otherwise why not drag in everyone who was in the area and start asking questions?

At some point the strings that connect them will be found and I really doubt they will end up being "alt right". Not too many climate change NGOs are run by "alt right" eco terrorists and funded by gov handouts.

3
Anither 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder why he would light fires then "blame government" for those fires? What end game was it?

Although the article states 99% of fires were lightning, they don't reference a source except an opinion by the spokesperson.

The truth is:

https://www.science.org/content/article/human-sparked-wildfires-are-more-destructive-those-caused-nature

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who knows if that's accurate. Pfizer never tested for it. if you hide the first 2 weeks as unvaccinated the cases will go unreported and misattributed.

Then you end up hiding issues like unintended protein generation which is a very serious issue. In this report anti inflammatory response from unintended protein generation occurs in one in ten:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376265782_Ribosomal_frameshifting_and_misreading_of_mRNA_in_COVID-19_vaccines_produces_off-target_proteins_and_immune_responses_eliciting_safety_concerns_Comment_on_UK_study_by_Mulroney_et_al

When the ribosome is confronted with a string of these modified bases called N1-methylpseudouridine in the mRNA, it slips around 10% of the time causing the mRNA to be misread and unintended proteins to be produced – enough to trigger an immune response>

The finding that unintended proteins may be produced as a result of vaccination is sufficient cause for regulators to conduct full risk assessments of past or future harms that may have ensued. We note that regulators have previously failed to insist on the study and assessment of risk of the pharmacology and toxicology of novel spike protein heterotrimers forming after injection of the bivalent COVID-19 modRNA vaccines.

By hiding injection status for 2 weeks as unvaccinated you can end up mis-attributing these issues to "it's in your genes" and blaming the patient for the sickness.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they should tell us the true counts so as not to hide the injuries from lipid nanoparticles causing PEG related anaphylaxis in those 2 weeks.

4
Anither 4 points ago +4 / -0

The brown shirts were the precursor to the social credit influencers we have today.

Facebook paid voice teams are just brown shirts.

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a conspiracy still. There should be names and dates associated with those statements and if a disposition occurred the date and members involved.

Anyone can claim anything -- look at what they did to Roy Moore and the truth only came out years after the claims dissolved.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/13/1117365135/roy-moore-defamation-suit-award-super-pac

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore_sexual_misconduct_allegations

They painted a picture using hearsay to implicate Roy Moore in misconduct that wasn't true and awarded

2
Anither 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's probably more like auto inflammatory disease and autoimmune disease. Both can be deadly.

The left likes to make fun of people who use the term VAIDs, although we are only a conservative administration away from defining it formally.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Battery's don't perform well in cold climates.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Intravenous administration of (+)NPs induced interferon type I response and elevated mRNA levels of interferon responsive genes 15-25-fold higher than neutral and (-)NPs in different subsets of leukocytes. Moreover, treatment with (+)NPs provoked a dramatic pro-inflammatory response by inducing Th1 cytokines expression (IL-2, IFN gamma and TNF alpha) 10-75-fold higher than treatment with control particles. Finally, we showed that activation of TLR4 might serve as the underlying mechanism for induction of an immune response when (+)NPs are used. These results suggest that a careful attention must be made when different types of (+)NPs are being developed as nanotherapeutics.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047613/

Lipid nanoparticles can cause brain damage through inflammation but the level of toxicity should be measured.

1
Anither 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I had to go back and find the reference url it was pretty easy. I looked at the article as valid. You looked at the article as invalid.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›