Lol, imaging thinking PPC voters care what the media thinks of us or us being on any watchlist. I'd be shocked if I wasn't already on a list.
Also, I am racist. I won't post racism here because it's against the rules but I am racist and proud of it. Like I care if someone calls me out for being who I am.
Facts are racist. - Ham brainwashed conservatard sandwich.
I'm now banned.
Even immigrant whites are easier to control by the state. Aristotle had a good quote on it. I think it's fair to assume Aristotle was discussing same race immigrants with these quotes because in other similar writings he discusses different city-States composed of the same "race" when discussing foreigners etc... Though it gets complicated modern views on race vs. classical views of ethnicity and race overlapping a lot.
The guard of a [legitimate] king is composed of citizens: that of a tyrant is composed of foreigners. (1310B31) - Aristotle
It is a habit of tyrants never to like anyone who has a spirit of dignity and independence. The tyrant claims a monopoly of such qualities for himself; he feels that anybody who asserts a rival dignity, or acts with independence, is threatening his own superiority and the despotic power of his tyranny; he hates him accordingly as a subverter of his own authority. It is also a habit of tyrants to prefer the company of aliens to that of citizens at table and in society; citizens, they feel, are enemies, but aliens will offer no opposition.” (1313B29) - Aristotle
Immigrants are not good for our society, period.
Yeah, attraction is huge in our society, especially for men. Being attractive as a man IMO is far more important than a woman. Unattractive women have many more options than unattractive men.
I lost out on the attractiveness thing. Even though I workout and exercise almost 7 days a week (Muay Thai and weight lifting), I'm just not there on the attractiveness scale. Genetics.
I've come to the same conclusion as you: "the best you can do is just have a family and shape the future you want to see through your kids". That's the part modern society bars from me. In order to start a family you need to find a woman but if women are being influenced by the very society you oppose, how will you be able to "shape the future you want to see through your kids" when she has divorced you, taken the kids and taught them the very opposite of what you believe?
You can say I'm over exaggerating but I'm already divorce, though no kids. I'm old enough now, 33yo, to know what kind of woman will work for me to start a family with and I can't attract this sort of women. The structure of society is very much a problem for this. Statistically, it's not just me with problems. The number of single adults in their prime ages has increased from 20% in the 60s to ~50% now. Divorces are up. Single mothers are up. The birth rate of natural western civilization people are below sustainable rates. Did you know the most unhappy archetype of person that exists in western society is a 40s single professional woman without children or a husband? But that is literally what the structure of society creates instead of creating mothers and wives, which means all in the community suffer, though the government doesn't care because they're fine with immigrants, a higher tax base and more productivity.
I'm glad it worked out for you though and I'm glad you're at least on this side of the fence. I see too many men that find what they're looking for in life and then blame everyone else who is unable to find what they want on themselves because their logic is if they can do it anyone can do it such that they deny there are any structural problems at play.
You are lucky then. I don't enjoy my life. I know plenty of guys that don't enjoy theirs either. Any guy who isn't enjoying things will stop and analyze why. For many guys, the problems lies in the structure of society. It is not possible for some guys to enjoy their life because of how the structure of society is.
Again, some guys get lucky, like yourself but many guys don't.
When guys who didn't get lucky decide to focus their energy on trying to improve things for themselves, every guy will eventually hit the blackpill because the sad reality is that men don't actually have any power or control in their lives enough to change the systems in place that are negatively impacting men's lives.
That leads to either accept things, move on and hope to get lucky in the future or don't accept things and try your best to navigate life while never finding it enjoyable.
It's not about reading forums like this. I know plenty of depressed guys that refuse to read forums like this. Personally, I find forums like this uplifting, knowing that it's not just me suffering out there.
The solutions I gave aren't hopeless ones, just hard ones to accomplish. I see too many solutions focused on "vote this party" or "organize a revolution". Both those are the wrong solutions IMO. False hope that won't ever solve anything.
This is a fairly decent grasp and summary, yes.
I don't think the tech is quite there yup. 3D printing a little gun that can fire a few times isn't it. The big issue is surveillance and communication. In wars, communication is extremely important. The manner in which the government gathers intel vs. what the average people are capable of is night and day. Furthermore the complexity of the level of ideological subversion governments are capable of vs. what the average citizen is aware of and capable of doing themselves is night and day. Until the playing field is level in these areas, the guns citizens own is mostly irrelevant.
You should fight back but use your energy toward innovation is what I'm essentially saying. You aren't going to win creating a secret militia group with 30 guys going around waving flags but if you got 30 guys to pool their resource together to try and research some sort of superior weapon or technology, that might actually get you somewhere. It's a much better use of energy.
All the "fighting back" has got us no where for over a century. We're continuing a march toward a certain end because we lack the correct power structures and systems in place to force the direction of the path in another direction.
A revolution won't change things as much as people think it might because any new regime will be equally as corrupted by the same pressures forcing things in a certain direction.
You must change these pressures and that's where innovations/inventions that have the power to change the pressures comes into effect.
Let's imagine best case scenario on crypto.
- You get paid in crypto.
- All stores accept crypto
- The government accepts crypto as currency for taxes
- Everyone in society has chosen to use crypto
- Cypto is not volatile and goes up at a predicted 1%/yr in value.
In effect, you can do everything in crypto.
Where your wrong is how you said nobody creates money out of no where. That's actually a fail. Banks will create money and simply use crypto. You think when we had gold, banks didn't "create money out of no where"? Haha....
The banks will offer to pay you interest if you give them your bitcoins. Perhaps you're a huge rebel so you're like, I don't need 1% return on my cyrpto... so the banks offer 2% or 3% and at this point someone has decided to give their cryptos to the banks. Man sends his crypto to bank wallet. Bank shows the man that he has $X in crypto stored at the bank. Then from here you get exactly the same sort of banking structure as you have now except you have crypto currencies instead of fiat currency. Nothing changes.
There is the aspect of inflation/deflation given that in such a scenario you remove the governments ability to control the money supply. I'd have to really think about this one to understand the impacts but I doubt there would be any major impacts that would change the very nature of society. It might simply lead to a little better quality of life for some people or perhaps worse but I don't foresee it doing more than that.
Vietnam is going the same way as western society now. They only delayed the inevitable. Afghan has a different social structure. It's still very agricultural based there without the same prevalence of technology in existence for information dissemination.
You're not comparing the same things.
The culture war won't win. Religions and other static ideologies with objective morals worked in periods of time where transportation and communication was not instant. In this world of instant communication and fast travel, it is very easy for governments to change values/beliefs of the population on a whim, which is what they do. The new religion is the State. You won't win the culture war. Look around at almost EVERY country in the world that has embraced modern communications technology. All their cultures are slowly bringing on more and more of essentially global western cultural values. Even China and even the Middle-East.
That's because the values are logical in order to promote the power of centralized authorities, most especially the western elite. If you want to win the culture war you need to set the terrain such that your culture and the way in which it is taught is superior to that of the government's but it's not superior. That's why you're losing and losing badly.
No being able to touch our money doesn't really do much for us. What's the use in that? I want to understand cryptos but I've never had anyone explain to me how they can be useful. I've heard many people say "cryptos are the future and will bring down central banks" but I don't see it and no one can explain it in detail. That's worrying to me and keeps me skeptical. It could be complex sure but I'd hope if it were real, I'd have an answer. Googling it doesn't have any written explanations either.
The left doesn't want power because the left has made a choice (whether conscious or not) to submit and obey the superior power of the government so the left acts as protectors and enforcers of the government. You won't convince these people with words but these people would respond to a superior authority.
The issue with trying to tell people the truth and explain how things would be better if they had more liberty is the same issue of trying to explain what it's like to skydive to someone who has never done it. Or try describing what chicken tastes like to someone who has never ate chicken. They won't get it until they've experienced it. The government has cutoff people from this through each consecutive generation. The only way to get these people back on your side is to give them freedom again so they know what it was they were missing and how their lives would be better in this regard. This only happens by disrupting the power of the government through options 1 and 2 I listed. Just talking to people won't ever work.
Why would a powerful centralized authority ever willingly give up its power? That's more the angle of my approach. I like decentralized but if you look back through human history, the only time we've had more "decentralized" governments is when organized government armies weren't significantly different than what a peasant army would look like. Any time government armies have a significant weapons advantage, we get much more centralized governments.
It's not about acquiring power through organization like a "terrorist" org but rather it's about acquiring power that is undeniable for governments. An example would be say someone figured out how to 3D print a nuclear bomb. It costs people like $3000 to do it all in and you can buy the supplies at your local grocery store. No matter what they government did, they wouldn't be able to deny this power.
I think cryptocurrencies are overvalued and hyped up too much for what they are. My education is finance and my profession is banking. I absolutely hate banks. If I thought crypto could destroy the establishment, I would be all in but I don't see how it can truly have a significant change.
I don't believe you'll ever win on mere discussions alone. The control of the government is too great. You may redpill the occasional person but for every 1 you redpill, the system bluepills a new generation. And if you redpill enough people, what then? Eventually, there's a conflict and if you don't have the weapons technology you need, you likely lose that conflict. All the people with funding will be funding your enemies, not you.
Thanks. Good luck on L3. I found L3 the easiest but some people find it the hardest. I heard they changed it up dramatically from when I took it though. Back when I took it, the trick IMO was to just figure out the direction you wanted to go and stick to it. If you started overthinking your solution and doubting yourself such that you paused too long to think through things, you'd run out of time without any good responses. Just start writing and don't stop. I think they care more about how you got to your answer and the content within rather than about if you actually got the overall recommendation right.
The CFA didn't help me at all in my career though and I hear they're dumbing it down to make it easier for people to get. I work at RBC and hardly anyone even even knows what a CFA is. None know what an FRM is. I honestly feel like I just wasted time. It seems like only women and POCs get ahead in banking and if you're a white male you better be the biggest SJW cocksucker around. Men like me aren't welcome.
He obviously wasn't liked by any of the major powers.
It's actually not about the money directly tied to the vaccines. It's about government power and control. The actual profit from vaccines is limited but governments have increased their power and control substantially. Furthermore, the debt that governments took out during the "pandemic" was all mostly transferred to large corporations from the poor to the rich. The trillions alone in transfer of wealth is worth far more than the vaccines are.
The Haitian President refused the covid-19 vaccines.
I'm done my CFA and FRM.
Ehhh, that's actually a pretty minor fuck up in the grand scheme of things. Women have always been men's greatest weakness. Max is sorely lacking in a lot of ways but he's better than anything else Canada has to offer.
Don't fall for online tradwhores. Real trad girls don't seek attention on the internet and real trad men don't need validation or support from women online.