3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, fat people that are fat due to life choices, which is the majority of fat people, should be ridiculed.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +3 / -2

Do you have anything to say about the other six?

I do. Whether they can actually lose weight or not due to their own personal determinants, increasing physical activity and decreasing caloric intake improves overall health for everyone.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you gay?

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t stare at the eclipse. Wait until it passes and then stare at the bare sun. This will give your eyes some essential vitamin D.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks capitalism? Did you type this on your iPhone or desktop computer?

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

She got it wrong, though. “Eventually” implies that it happens gradually over time. Things go to shit fast.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

I debunked this study that you posted a billion times.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

The government should cap how much profit Walmart is allowed to make, amirite?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m with you, man. People are dumb. Reminds me of my neighbor, Dave. He smokes 2 packs a day and is the healthiest guy in the neighborhood. And they try to tell us that smoking is bad for you. Pffft.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals labeling their degenerate policies as progressive is actually brilliant marketing. Whoever came up with that deserves a raise.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Real estate millionaire and former president. I don’t think career loser is an appropriate description. How’s your career doing, though?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

tar baby - a difficult problem that is only aggravated by attempts to solve it. "disposal of nuclear waste was a problem whose solution was endlessly delayed, a tar baby no one wanted anything to do with"

And there’s a second racist definition.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post hoc fallacies are committed when one argues that because B happened immediately after A, A must be the cause of B. The point is not that there can’t be a causal connection between A and B but rather that there isn’t adequate evidence for the conclusion.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fox isn’t the source. They’re just one of the very few media outlets reporting this. this is the source

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s quite a way to say that you were wrong and agree with me.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don’t need to be an infectious disease expert to interpret infectious disease data, retard. You do, however, need to be an expert in interpreting statistical data. The author has a phd in stats. She’s fully qualified to interpret the data.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your question is particularly funny because you’ve been claiming 1% covid death rate until I corrected you only just recently.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›