"Sociopathic traits" could mean any of a massive number, a lot of which are quite healthy, even pro-social. An unwillingness to follow crowds used to be considered a sign of character, for instance.

Worth it to whom?

I realise this adds little to the thread, but what the fuck kind of name is that? She sounds like she ought to be in a dark cave gnawing on bones in a choose-your-own-adventure book.

Sad to say there's only so much cops can do to enforce the law- to hold a criminal, they need to charge and convict him- that's where the Lawyer's Guild, Soros DAs, and bail funds come in to ensure the violent rioters can do it again and again. It's hard to imagine a more viciously antisocial movement than those engaging in lawfare to prolong the violence.

How was he out doing this for three years, and stayed off investigators' radar for another four? The cops might be fucking useless, they often are, but a pattern would surely start to emerge?

It really needs impressing on people that if you're the victim of sex offences like this, go to the police as soon as possible.

You mean this phenomenon, which is healthy and natural according to top politicians, has comorbidities and impedes function? Like a mental illness? No, I'm sure it's everybody else who is the problem.

I upvoted OP just because of Sheeran's oddly neotenous face. I probably couldn't pick his music out of a random playlist of recent pop, and he might even be a fairly nice guy, but he has the face of a portly twelve year old marching band kid and I can't stand it.

Dear Michael Winerip,

If you check their charge sheet, you will find that most are guilty of offences relating to the grooming of a child for sexual purposes, sending pornography to minors, and endangering the welfare of a child. It should not need to be explained that the elements of those crimes (mens rea and actus reus) are satisfied provided the paedophile thought he was speaking to a child.

I hope this helps calm some of your obsessive paranoia against civilised, white society.

"Rakim, Oakland: See, computers are racist because they make them too hard to use. They need to make them easy like TV, so people in the community can have good jobs. Computers are made by whites and Chinese, and they don't like it when we try to get ahead."

I wonder which of those a shitlib would like to live next door to?

Funnily when you see such projections in non-White countries (e.g. Kashmir) the same people pushing the replacement here suddenly turn militant for the right of the natives to a homeland that is specifically theirs.

Ultimately, the final recourse in all of these questions is de facto violence, when all else fails- your homeland exists so long as you are willing and able to defend it. We have politics to keep us from the state of nature, but democracy demonstrably fails when you don't have one 'demos'. I pray that the course is corrected before it's too late and violence becomes inevitable.

This is madness. I understand, to a certain extent, Canadian altruism as Canada was built in pretty inhospitable climates for much of the vast territory, but we all across the West need to remember who our people are and start putting them first.

I don't have any ill will towards people of other races, but Canada as it stands was built by settlers and is still a wealthy and peaceful country because of those people and their descendants. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Canada came with the white man, and if those trends continue, will leave with him.

For the sake of my sanity, I'll tell myself this is some kind of troll job. Honestly, if he's for real, they should come and ask him some questions, and if he's unconvincing, put him on the register.

"I haven't committed heinous crime X, but I have incredibly strong urges to do so, I hang around with like-minded people, including those who have committed the heinous crime, and I think it's morally justifiable" is a pretty good risk indicator IMO.

The US and UK had 'trigger events' that coalesced the new Right in a way that Canada is yet to experience. In the US, the rise of Trump is the obvious turning point. He came out on a platform of social conservatism, without the appalling chamber-of-commerce baggage that weighed the US right down for so long. I'm no communist, but "what's good for big corporations is good for the country" needed dealing with, along with that faggot Paul Ryan.

The UK had Brexit, which struck at the heart of the globalist experiment. The old battle lines were completely redrawn around attitudes to the EU. Tories, whose grassroots were always a lot more traditionalist/nationalist than the party, split with their elite. Labour lost their working-class base, decisively, to the Brexiteers. I'm still not fully sold on Johnson, as he seems to be appeasing the left far more than he should be (if they don't like it, why don't they try winning a crushing majority?), but the Brexit Party's show of strength when the main parties were vacillating, and UKIP's meteoric rise beforehand, will still have them on notice.

Canada hasn't yet been put to such a question. Trudy is certainly aggravating, but even his constant ethical breaches and dictatorial rulings aren't the "black swan" events that Brexit or Trump were.

This kind of straight-out emotional manipulation pisses me off. It's of a kind with "If it saves one life" bullshit. Fuck your mother, Ryan.

If I had to choose between running the Canadian economy off a cliff, taking the healthcare system (tax funded!), basic rights and freedoms with it, and telling your mother to become a hermit if she's that fucking terrified, it's not exactly the hardest decision to make.

I believe the poofters more than the muzzies in this one. The reason is the classic trope from hate hoaxes- the immediate resort to clumsy, open racism from the bad guy:

shut the fuck up you Arab assholes

...right after he's shoulder charged a woman off a scooter for no apparent reason. I think he didn't get out of the way fast enough, but electric scooter riders on the pavement are almost certainly in the wrong if a pedestrian is hit IMO.

The writer should be more careful- it's not a button that mutes Whites, but rather a 'sticker' that can be posted in whatever passes for chat on that thot-image dissemination system.

I don't use instagram, but Whatsapp pulls its gifs from the same place and for weeks the ones that pop up first are "vapid BLM slogan over childish doodle of a wog", when they aren't anus-related rainbows. Search will bring up many more, but if you put in right-wing stuff you'll either get no results or negative ones.

I think if you see them commit an offence, right in front of you, you're probably still good, but that offence had better be on the bigger side and have a clearly defined victim (most likely you) before you even think of calling. Aggravated trespass? Loitering with intent? Following you for no plausible reason? I'm afraid his knife/dick has to be put in you before you make that call, Karen.

Remember Mollie Tibbetts? Right around the time she was murdered, there was an upswing in this media-pushed narrative that white women are calling the cops on minorities for no reason. She was followed by her murderer and he killed her apparently after confronting her- it was only then she threatened to call (but didn't actually call) 911. I wonder if she had been quicker on the phone, would she still be alive?

We might all see "Central Park Karen", but what we all know we don't see in the mainstream media is murders and rapes of white women, and who is disproportionately responsible. What ends does it serve to limit white womens' recourse to the protections of the law through an obvious chilling effect?

Each time I start to think "Maybe they have overreached this time- maybe this will make people wonder", and each time I stop thinking that soon after. Vandalism is now either a hate crime or laudable, depending on the colour of your skin. Honk honk!

Good post, my only suggestion is "don't repeat the charges"- you might scare normies with "Big Tech says we're thoughtcriminals" in the last three lines. I'd end with the list, myself.

Tempted to run a few of these out there, see how ludicrous my story can get before I pull the plug. Media outlets literally scour reddit for stories, top prize would be for getting a journo to bite.

Yes, of course. There's horrible shit going on, not going to deny it, and maybe Canada won't carry on in its current form as a continent-sized unit, but the first Canadians built the country from a vast expanse of nothing and still retain the ability to do so again, only wiser for the first experience. Maybe Wexit would be a first step on that road, despite the smaller territory- where you find Canadians, there you have Canada.

OmegaCanadian, but not a Canadian (UK native here). I like Max, but first-past-the-post is always a mountain to climb. I think if he focuses on one or two pressure points (immigration is an obvious choice), he at the very least can score wins from forcing the hand of the established Conservatives.

This was the UKIP tactic and it worked well in the end, but it depended on the Tories being the "natural party of government" in the UK, and Labour heartlands also being tempted by UKIP messaging. I'm not sure how the Liberal vote breaks down in Canada, but I'm assuming you don't have sufficient petty-bourgeois types for that on its own to carry an election for them, and that the old Left of the industrial heartlands is going to be very much in play for a movement in the economic centre and social right.

It's a bloody good point. It's almost frightening how people are expected to look at that and see (or declare) beauty- the thing that opened my eyes to this particular strain of goodthink was the lauding of Michelle Obama, who frankly could pass for the lunatic in your post, as some paragon of beauty across the media.