7
Ontarian 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've never believed that the vaccines would "100% gold-plated guarantee against getting the tiniest bit sick". This is what governments tried to make people think, and 80% of Canadians believed it. The India variant wave would have rapidly subsided as it did elsewhere even without a mass vaccination campaign, any strains on the health care system could have been mitigated by other means.

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if you're a violent homicidal thug you're still entitled to certain rights--as far as I know you can't be denied food, shelter, and medical treatment in retaliation for any evil acts you commit. That's what sets our society apart from many other parts of the world which have few if any human rights. By your logic we should be denying medical care to people with HIV/AIDs, especially those who engage in unprotected sex, because of the threat they have and still do pose to society.

2
Ontarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If there plan was "killing federal officials, derailing trains and poisoning water supplies as part of a violent, disruptive scheme to exploit political and social tensions and trigger a race war in the United States" then they should never be allowed out of prison.

1
Ontarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

What hostility? I'm simply stating the truth.

4
Ontarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Social safety net is supposed to keep any citizen from falling through "the cracks" rather than a privilege for those who will comply with the sometimes tyrannical dictates of the government.

1
Ontarian 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you think these people will actually agree to do so if asked? No, they're the experts who are following directives from higher up - you as a recipient of the vaccine have no say in the matter.

2
Ontarian 2 points ago +3 / -1

a) Soliman sued the guy's parents and actually got a settlement?

b) Two women who were defamed by BLM only got $100,000?

5
Ontarian 5 points ago +6 / -1

77 people in ICU out of a population of 1.2 million. And how much of this could have been prevented if government wasn't denying preventative treatments because supposedly "conspiracy theories"?

4
Ontarian 4 points ago +5 / -1

I read the other day that there are "archivists" collecting accounts of people's experiences during the pandemic for future generations. I'm hoping they also objectively collect tens of thousands of social media posts by very low risk people panicking and demanding to be vaccinated before most people aged 65+ could even get their first dose.

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm confused as to why during this "pandemic" we have a labour shortage when we have so many native born or long-time residents who are un- or underemployed.

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +4 / -1

Japan hit a peak of 24000+ cases in August when the county was c. 40% fully vaxxed. At the same time it reached a peak of about 50 deaths per day. If this had nothing to do with ivermectin, I'd love to know what it is? I'm assuming a very low obesity rate is key. Sea food in diet?

1
Ontarian 1 point ago +3 / -2

Universities are providing us with an example of how populations can be harmonized and how easily it can be achieved.

1
Ontarian 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, actually it's completely irrelevant to this specific topic of a mass mostly-outdoors event not resulting in an outbreak despite fear-mongering predictions.

6
Ontarian 6 points ago +7 / -1

Irrelevant to this discussion. Since vaccinated people catch and spread covid19, even in a setting where 100% of people are vaccinated, it should still spread. The vaccine isn't 100% effective and its effectiveness declines with time. My guess that non-outbreak has a lot more to do with natural immunity than it does vaccinations.

3
Ontarian 3 points ago +4 / -1

Which has no stated connection to the event. This despite dire fear-mongering warnings by mostly anonymous social media experts that there would be a "surge" in cases, that hospitals should brace for an influx of people admitted to ICUs.

4
Ontarian 4 points ago +5 / -1

The point is the "far-left" is just as authoritarian as the "far-right". The far-left has no tolerance for differing opinions because they have a very specific agenda and any dissension threatens their ability to achieve their goals. Balgord's statement about what the far-right would do if they got into power is hypocritical because we all know that when the far-left gets into power they "discriminate against, exile and execute their opponents" with impunity. Not just because of "race" or "skin colour" but for any excuse that's convenient.

0
Ontarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Let's face it, this is about politics. Since the intruder was from Six Nations -- something Khill likely couldn't have known -- they're never going to let this rest until Khill is in jail for the rest of his life.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›