I've never believed that the vaccines would "100% gold-plated guarantee against getting the tiniest bit sick". This is what governments tried to make people think, and 80% of Canadians believed it. The India variant wave would have rapidly subsided as it did elsewhere even without a mass vaccination campaign, any strains on the health care system could have been mitigated by other means.
Even if you're a violent homicidal thug you're still entitled to certain rights--as far as I know you can't be denied food, shelter, and medical treatment in retaliation for any evil acts you commit. That's what sets our society apart from many other parts of the world which have few if any human rights. By your logic we should be denying medical care to people with HIV/AIDs, especially those who engage in unprotected sex, because of the threat they have and still do pose to society.
If there plan was "killing federal officials, derailing trains and poisoning water supplies as part of a violent, disruptive scheme to exploit political and social tensions and trigger a race war in the United States" then they should never be allowed out of prison.
I read the other day that there are "archivists" collecting accounts of people's experiences during the pandemic for future generations. I'm hoping they also objectively collect tens of thousands of social media posts by very low risk people panicking and demanding to be vaccinated before most people aged 65+ could even get their first dose.
Japan hit a peak of 24000+ cases in August when the county was c. 40% fully vaxxed. At the same time it reached a peak of about 50 deaths per day. If this had nothing to do with ivermectin, I'd love to know what it is? I'm assuming a very low obesity rate is key. Sea food in diet?
Irrelevant to this discussion. Since vaccinated people catch and spread covid19, even in a setting where 100% of people are vaccinated, it should still spread. The vaccine isn't 100% effective and its effectiveness declines with time. My guess that non-outbreak has a lot more to do with natural immunity than it does vaccinations.
Which has no stated connection to the event. This despite dire fear-mongering warnings by mostly anonymous social media experts that there would be a "surge" in cases, that hospitals should brace for an influx of people admitted to ICUs.
The point is the "far-left" is just as authoritarian as the "far-right". The far-left has no tolerance for differing opinions because they have a very specific agenda and any dissension threatens their ability to achieve their goals. Balgord's statement about what the far-right would do if they got into power is hypocritical because we all know that when the far-left gets into power they "discriminate against, exile and execute their opponents" with impunity. Not just because of "race" or "skin colour" but for any excuse that's convenient.
His opinion matters why exactly?