Tell us all how that 97% number was conceived.
For some reason you've assumed in a part of that crowd. Like I said, you're barking up the wrong tree.
It's a bit too late to try the "I don't care" line. Your silly argument lost all of its spark and thats all you have left.
So sad.
I'll play a melancholy song for you to dance to.
Assuming makes an ass out of U not me. L
Science by consensus is not science. Climate change pushers are science deniers.
Is that seriously the best you have?
I've gotten better arguments from my 5 year old.
That's not how logic works.
Try again.
Why does this guy keep deleting his posts? I do like your angle on this though.
You seem to be stuck on a claim I've never made. I don't think you have the intellect to exist. But here you are.
Last chance.
Prove the claims you are making.
I know you can't. And so does everyone else.
Dance, monkey.
Watch as you dance again.
It seems that you have a following that hates you.
Not hard to see why.
Define why you want banks to have control of access to your money.
Explain your title. It lacks evidence.
Hahaha hahahaha
You are a class act. The idiocy of your logic shines through.
You aren't worth responding too. Like I said, it's fun.
I'll be waiting to hear your next word vomit as I command you to dance monkey.
You're the dumb fuck chasing a rabbit down a hole that doesn't exist.
Let's go ahead and pose a challenge for you.
Copy/paste the moment I claimed the flu "vaccine" is good.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
When you can't, the only words that will acceptable from you are, "I'm an idiot and tried to make an argument where none existed"
Good luck and may the odds be ever in your favor.
Chump.
Let's get your "logic" straight.
If I don't complain about a previous "vaccine" that isn't part of the conversation I can't state that the current fad that you follow also isn't one?
That's not how logic works.
You took an experiment and are now lashing out with regret. Good luck to you. Do you have a good bye message ready or will you just disappear one day?
The word vomit you just posted isn't worth responding to.
But, like I said, I enjoy wasting paid time.
Your argument would first have to prove that I call the thing you are calling a vaccine, a vaccine. Your entire rant hinges on this one simple assumption that you made.
Then you would have to prove that I've accepted an injection of any kind. Good luck with that.
Shouting into the cults well? Yes, I'm challenging the things you say, easily by the way, to understand the cult you belong to.
The fact that you are funded is not a belief. Theres also a reason you can't seem to boost anything that gets a positive rating. Always in the negative before I even read it.
Who claims?
You claim.
And who are the folks you are talking to? The votes would say no one.
You're barking up the wrong tree thinking any of your opinions hold weight with me.
I'll waste your time making you reply to me because I find it amusing. It doesn't bother me that your time is funded.
Some of us are still using the old definition and if it doesn't meet that definition it will not be used by us. Neither Fauci nor the CDC gets to change the vocabulary for us.
You are trying to play a semantics game and it only makes you look stupid.
You obviously haven't been paying attention.
The jab fails according to the actual definition of a vaccine. Not the latest "approved by fauci" definition.
See my reply to your other recycled comment.
Absolutely not. That's just for me and mine.
The world is better off without sheep like yourself.
It's just like watching a junkie OD. People like yourself put the same amount of effort into understanding what you put in your bodies.
At least twice, IIRC.
Liberal who couldn't deal with the fact that climate change is a lie tried to create climate change but failed miserably.
That's why they changed the definition a couple of times to match.
See my other reply. I'm too busy to respond to you repeating yourself.