As I stated both times before:
You are still trying to call it a puppy, intent on garnering sympathy.
You've never dealt with reality.
You've never had to deal with reality and it shows.
The age of a dog is fucked?
Or the emotional draw from the narrative that it was an innocent puppy is fucked?
14 months is no longer a puppy.
That's a guy who rapes because he's convinced they want it. They struggle because they just like it rough.
This is no longer considered a mental illness.
This woman makes hypocrites out of the right. They bend over backwards to defend her when they should be casting her out as a parish. She doesn't hold their values.
If someone represents themselves in a bad way, why would you choose them to represent you?
Now look at why evergrande is going bankrupt in china.
Notice any similarities?
Much less a dictator than the black faced cuck trudeau.
First you tried to assign him to MAGA, now qanon?
Check again. I find it amusing that by the time I see your reply, several other people have seen it and already agree with me before I can respond.
Hahaha! Keep trying. The facts speak for themselves.
Thanks for the assistance. I'm still trying to figure out which letter is changed in your name vs OP. Top tier trolling.
Yes I did. Then others provided evidence.
You are on the side of pedophilia and we all hate you.
They are only posting the ones who ironically say that pedophilia is right wing, so I can see why you think it's a lot.
There are so many dems they haven't posted.
Do we need to post all of the Democrat child rapists? The ratio is much heavier on that side.
You wanting to avoid it doesn't make it baseless. It just means you don't want the information to be applied.
You are dishonest. Everyone knows it.
Keep dancing.
Everyone has already noticed that you side stepped the funding question.
Convenient.
No dumbass. Your "concensus" is cherry picked data.
Next, show the funding sources for the sub 12K studies.
Cherry picking data is dishonest.
You are dishonest.
Still on with the same thing. Repeating yourself is a sign of idiocy.
Your point is irrelevant because you haven't applied it to a single thing I've said.
I'll wait for you to show proof.
Did you need the scientific method explained to you or are you going to act like a petulant child and ignore it?
Secondly, explain how you arrived at the percentage you did. Because it was NOT achieved by all of the "scientists" writing the exact same studies. Until you come to terms with that piece of information, you are being non scientific.
Cool we can go all night. If you say something interesting instead of repeating yourself. I can tell you are close to breaking by the way you are responding.
Dance, my pet!
See my other reply. I'm too busy to respond to you repeating yourself.
Why do people insist on calling things by the wrong name? None of you exist in a capitalist or a free market system. None of this would be allowed in either of those.