Did you need the scientific method explained to you or are you going to act like a petulant child and ignore it?
Secondly, explain how you arrived at the percentage you did. Because it was NOT achieved by all of the "scientists" writing the exact same studies. Until you come to terms with that piece of information, you are being non scientific.
Did you need the scientific method explained to you or are you going to act like a petulant child and ignore it?
Secondly, explain how you arrived at the percentage you did. Because it was NOT achieved by all of the "scientists" writing the exact same studies. Until you come to terms with that piece of information, you are being non scientific.
She was going to explain or support her opinion that scientists agreeing is not science.
Below are some examples of scientists agreeing folks. Perhaps shitheel can provide some support for her personal opinion that "Climate change pushers are science deniers."
https://web.archive.org/web/20181022184656/https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf
https://www.academie-sciences.fr/archivage_site/activite/rapport/avis0605a_gb.pdf
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
Point and laugh at the vaccinated land whale ⬆️
💉💉💉🪦
🥱