Is that the narrative they're selling to you guys now? Peer reviewed scientific studies are cherry picked? They don't even include things that aren't peer reviewed so literally everything has been verified by a panel of experts. I've seen y'all claim absolute truth our of sketchier pre-prints without peer review and this is leaps and bounds above that in terms of validity.
Next, show the funding sources for the sub 12K studies.
Cherry picking data is dishonest.
You are dishonest.
You're a fucking clown. It's not cherry picking data, it's literally just all the data we have for the time period
Point and laugh at the vaccinated diabetic landwhale 😂
💉💉💉🪦
Soon to get suddenly’d boomer 💉💉🪦
😂🤣
No dumbass. Your "concensus" is cherry picked data.
Is that the narrative they're selling to you guys now? Peer reviewed scientific studies are cherry picked? They don't even include things that aren't peer reviewed so literally everything has been verified by a panel of experts. I've seen y'all claim absolute truth our of sketchier pre-prints without peer review and this is leaps and bounds above that in terms of validity.
💉💉💉⚰️☠️🪦
Everyone has already noticed that you side stepped the funding question.
Convenient.