-1
tuchodi -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your unsupported personal opinion is noted.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +1 / -5

Huh. The same poll says more respondents favoured Kamala Harris than Donald Trump.

But of course the impostor wouldn't tell you that.

And she certainly wouldn't link to the poll so you could do see what it says.

She just wants you to know her version of the story folks.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +1 / -5

Question: "five different jurisdictions, five different prosecutors, five different juries and/or judges, all conspiring together [to convict Trump]?"

Answer: "100%"

There you have it folks.

The impostor fits right in with this cult.

0
tuchodi 0 points ago +1 / -1

🤣🤣

Deflection folks.

Doesn't change any facts.

0
tuchodi 0 points ago +1 / -1

🤣🤣

Deflection folks.

Doesn't change any facts.

-2
tuchodi -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not a single crime has been committed

Canadette doesn't know Steve Bannon is currently in jail folks.

That's how much she knows about what's going on in the real world.

And Bannon isn't the only one. https://www.axios.com/2024/03/07/trump-associates-prison-sentence-crimes-list

-1
tuchodi -1 points ago +1 / -2

She's free to choose her friends folks.

Her friends say something about her.

-2
tuchodi -2 points ago +1 / -3

Only because you can't read.

-2
tuchodi -2 points ago +1 / -3

Democraps are registering illegals to vote

No proof so far folks.

-2
tuchodi -2 points ago +1 / -3

Looks like the impostor wishes any of those other people from 4 years ago was relevant now.

She's like someone who tries to drive by looking in the rear-view mirror.

-2
tuchodi -2 points ago +1 / -3

The impostor thinks there were no homeless people under Trump folks.

-3
tuchodi -3 points ago +1 / -4

Aww is this the best you can do?

Stealing form a children's cacer charity is OK with Canadette folks.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +1 / -5

Democraps are registering illegals to vote

Prove it.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

Democraps are registering illegals to vote

The impostor offer no proof folks.

As usual.

-3
tuchodi -3 points ago +1 / -4

You can easily search this on a search engine

1 - I'm still not seeing any proof that "deaths never happened" as Canadette claims.

2 - The retraction does not dispute that there were deaths.

3 - A correction to one paper does not invalidate all the others.

For example - emphasis added:
"This collaborative meta-analysis of 28 published or unpublished RCTs, including 10,319 patients, shows that treatment with HCQ was associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there was no benefit from treatment with CQ." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22446-z#Sec3

"Less than 3 months later, on June 15, 2020, the Emergency Use Authorization [ for cholorquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate] was revoked by the Food and Drug Administration because the agency had determined that the drugs were not likely to be effective and that their use was known to lead to serious cardiovascular adverse effects." https://images.journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/PdfPageImage.00045391-202404000-00010.0.jpeg

"No further trials of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for treatment should be carried out." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33624299/

"We observed, with high level of certainty of evidence, that HCQ is not effective in reducing mortality in patients with COVID-19. Lower certainty evidence also suggests that HCQ neither improves viral clearance and other clinical outcomes, nor prevents COVID-19 infection in patients with high-risk exposure. HCQ is associated with an increased rate of adverse events." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33606894/

For more on CQ & HCQ toxicity see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537086/

-3
tuchodi -3 points ago +1 / -4

No proof, of course.

Tweets and jpegs are all Canadette ever posts folks.

Unsupported opinions from an anonymous person on an obscure social media site.

It's like Bullshityouharder made a new account.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +1 / -5

In the past century - that's 25 presidential elections - the Republican candidate has only won the popular vote 9 times folks. https://www.britannica.com/topic/United-States-Presidential-Election-Results-1788863

When the republican candidate wins the presidency it's often because the electoral college gave it to them, not because they got the most votes.

-3
tuchodi -3 points ago +1 / -4

It's a pipe dream folks.

Look at those numbers:

  • 7 states
  • a 1 point lead in 4 of them
  • tied in a fifth

This is the slimmest of margins, and it's the best an extreme right-wing outlet can come up with.

Wishful thinking.

Remember the "red wave" that never happened in the 2022 mid-terms?

Same thing here.

This is just another facet of the attempt to make it look like Trump had a chance so they can claim the election was rigged/stolen/whatever.

In reality it's all over but the right-wing crying.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›