I would love to read something tha spertains to the context.
The context is whether people want to accept the fact that part of the human population does not fit neatly into the oversimplification that "there are only two genders". I've given you something to read about it and you say
wheni do take ten minutes to read your links ita irrelevant
so I guess I have nothing you want.
So what of my spelling has errors call the grammar police.
Nah. I'm just pointing out that the people I know with masters degrees - like you claim to have - can spell better.
thank you and all the best.
You too. Good luck.
Okay ill stop. Thanks bye (https://omegacanada.win/p/17t1aqtXnA/x/c/4ZBIL5x4IiP?d=50)
20 minutes later:
Tell us about all the "ANTIVAXXXXERS" You personally know who died.
Doesn’t change the fact that you are dumb too.
Or the fact that the anonymous people here think their lack of expertise in anything relevant qualifies them to ignore experts in the field. https://omegacanada.win/p/17t1fPbk1o/
a basic understanding of the scientific process
Here in omegacanada "scientific process" means anonymous opinions, supermarket magazine articles, and long-winded web pages - often anonymous as well - by people with no expertise in a field that's relevant to the topic being discussed.
Any links to published peer reviewed research are uniformly ignored. Seriously. That stuff rarely gets read by anybody else here. This isn't the forum for that.
I though you were smart.
Nah. I just read what the experts say.
You should try it instead of wasting time in anonymous forums.
Unless you just came here looking for approval for your opinions.
There's a lot of that going in omegacanada.win.
You aren't a professor.
Never claimed to be.
I tried to get you to read what one had to say.
More than once.
Hasn't worked so far.
Just thought of something: is it possible her browser doesn't display linked text? Or she's some kind of colour blind? If so maybe this will help: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-why-human-sex-is-not-binary/
Theres not a lot you can teach me
I sure can't get you to read anything. And you can't supply anything other than unsupported opinions. You're just another anonymous poster spouting off without a shred of evidence.
your noy worth anyone's time.
But here you are, still spending time.
This they doesnt even kow my level of educatuon or otherwise
I have an idea, based on your spelling. But it doesn't matter because all you offer are some anonymous and unsupported opinions on a small social media platform.
Your just a poser pretending to be academic.
Nope. I give you links to academic stuff but you don't read them. That's on you.
Source please
If you actually do want to read it: last December the impostor or her twinsie (I forget which) posted a picture of this article and it had the numbers.
The formatting is terrible so you have to dig for the numbers. I doubt you'll go to the trouble.
You don't appear to want to read anything.
Urallfucked is kind of like-able
Do you mean the Urallfucked that's been here for 3 years or the UraIIfucked that's been here for 1?
She claims she joined "To learn something" and then refused to learn a thing from the professor.
The implication seems to be that she only learns if someone in an anonymous forum can debate her into changing her mind.
Just reading up on a subject doesn't work for her.
Odd.
You asked "But what if one got the vaccine AND got infected?" and I gave you examples of several states where vaccinated people did better than unvaccinated.
Seems like an answer to me.
Maybe you can show how it isn't..
Im already learned
She already knows it all folks. No point in her reading what a professor of Anthropology from Princeton has to say. If Professor Fuentes says something different from good ol' Koknutz, well, then Koknutz knows the professor is wrong.
There's a name for this delusion folks. Anyone know what it is?
Mine is crossed out.
Correct.
You don't mind not knowing what you're talking about.
You could learn, but I guess that's not what you're here for. You appear to want to argue with people you don't know, or maybe you're just looking for people to agree with your uninformed opinions.
I asked "what does it [science] have to say on the subject of how many genders there are?"
You said
Men women and hermaphrodite
I appreciate the effort you put into offering your opinion, but I'm beginning to suspect we have a failure to communicate.
Can you supply any science?
The impostor lives in the US, apparently.