Take the untested gene therapy. You dont need the 2nd dose in the recommended time frame. Just wait 4 months between doses. We dont need the super cold fridges anymore. Dont worry about the blood clots, that means its working. You can mix and match different gene therapies even when one set is chimpanzee adenovirus and the other is a spike protein based one. They are identical in every way, so you can have one for first dose and the other for second dose and its the same even months apart and nowhere near dose schedule. Oh and you can take them when they expire. That's just science.
AstroZeneca is not gene therapy. AstroZeneca is the clot shot designed to scare you into seeking out the gene therapy instead.
However if you took AstraZeneca for the first dose you must take Pfizer/Moderna for the second dose. If you took Pfizer/Moderna for the first dose it is "perfectly fine" to take AstraZeneca for the second dose. Two doses of Pfizer/Moderna is ideal. If you took Sputnik V or SinoVac or CoviVac it will not be recognized by the Canadian government. You must get additional doses of Pfizer/Moderna. Johnson & Johnson is deemed less effective and you will be first in line for the Pfizer/Moderna boosters.
Look at the common thread. One way or another they are aiming to get the Pfizer/Moderna vaccines (MRNA) into your body.
Agreed. It's hard (if not impossible) to find any criticism in the media about the mRNA gene therapy but there's plenty about the others.
If the media is for mRNA, I'm against it.
And it's not a coincidence that AstraZeneca/J&J are the cheapest and Pfizer/Moderna the most expensive.
It's not hard you just have to look pre-covid19. The animal trial results post-SARS COV1 in the early 2000s were not promising. The mechanism is valid as described but it is almost too effective. it completely short circuits the various homeostatic systems in your body. It's a testament to the hubris of these doctors that they ignored or blinded themselves to all of the major red flags.
It may be useful for actual gene therapy. But using it as a vehicle for a vaccine technology is completely out of scope and very reckless.
Take the untested gene therapy. You dont need the 2nd dose in the recommended time frame. Just wait 4 months between doses. We dont need the super cold fridges anymore. Dont worry about the blood clots, that means its working. You can mix and match different gene therapies even when one set is chimpanzee adenovirus and the other is a spike protein based one. They are identical in every way, so you can have one for first dose and the other for second dose and its the same even months apart and nowhere near dose schedule. Oh and you can take them when they expire. That's just science.
AstroZeneca is not gene therapy. AstroZeneca is the clot shot designed to scare you into seeking out the gene therapy instead.
However if you took AstraZeneca for the first dose you must take Pfizer/Moderna for the second dose. If you took Pfizer/Moderna for the first dose it is "perfectly fine" to take AstraZeneca for the second dose. Two doses of Pfizer/Moderna is ideal. If you took Sputnik V or SinoVac or CoviVac it will not be recognized by the Canadian government. You must get additional doses of Pfizer/Moderna. Johnson & Johnson is deemed less effective and you will be first in line for the Pfizer/Moderna boosters.
Look at the common thread. One way or another they are aiming to get the Pfizer/Moderna vaccines (MRNA) into your body.
Of course. I'm by no means advocating for any of them. The best covid vaccine is none of them.
Just hypothetically if they've got me strapped to a table and tell me to choose the MRNA ones are at the bottom of the list.
Agreed. It's hard (if not impossible) to find any criticism in the media about the mRNA gene therapy but there's plenty about the others.
If the media is for mRNA, I'm against it.
And it's not a coincidence that AstraZeneca/J&J are the cheapest and Pfizer/Moderna the most expensive.
It's not hard you just have to look pre-covid19. The animal trial results post-SARS COV1 in the early 2000s were not promising. The mechanism is valid as described but it is almost too effective. it completely short circuits the various homeostatic systems in your body. It's a testament to the hubris of these doctors that they ignored or blinded themselves to all of the major red flags.
It may be useful for actual gene therapy. But using it as a vehicle for a vaccine technology is completely out of scope and very reckless.