CONTEXT:
https://omegacanada.win/p/12jJLGfjg1/ctv-bullshit-unvaccinated-people/
1.) You never addressed my comments related to PREP and HIV.
The treatment can create super strains directly as a result of the TREATMENT.
2.) Significantly more effort was afforded to using Africa as Guinea pigs for improperly introduced vaccine experimentation than providing clean drinking water and food.
Polio, a highly infectious disease that spreads through contaminated water or food.
Africans hate The gates foundation with a passion for exploiting them for medical research and having extensive Vaccine damages. There is extensive evidence in both Africa and India of the Gates Foundation acting in bad faith with devastating consequences.
2.) Discrepancies
A molecular clock analysis timed the emergence of the precursor to the Epsilon variant to May of 2020 in California.
Your initial reference was of epsilon appearing in July, your current reference is to epsilon appearing in May. I have scanned multiple different "studies" with dates all over the place. I even corrected your date of Oct for Alpha, It was September as that appears to be the consensus... on average.
The only evidence you've provided to back that statement up is for one variant, the Epsilon, and it appears to be incorrect.
NO, it is YOU who were found incorrect. See response #3.
Do you not find these multitudes of discrepancies of dates by official sources to be highly disturbing?
3.) Pfizer Data
Well, no. The list of variants we're discussing only had one entry from the US: the Epsilon variant. It appeared in May 2020.
Well YES.
PHASE 3 Pfizer Clinical Trials began in July. "Early" Stage Trials began BEFORE.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/health/pfizer-vaccine-coronavirus.amp.html
For Christ sake. HUMAN Trials were under way well before. "Early" Stage Trials began immediately in Moderna.
What I find most disturbing is your ability to ignore mass discrepancies and cherry picking of data from a select STAGE.
Let's stick to the topic at hand: the lack so far of evidence of a causal relationship between the variants and the vaccines. We can talk about the Gates Foundation in another thread.
YOU will not direct my conversation in the direction that is most convient to YOUR conclusions.
4.) Vaccine Hesitancy researcher.
> WHY are you here.
To see if claims that the MSM is lying to me are supportable. It's OK to have a wide variety of opinions on a subject because it makes for a healthy discussion, but at some point facts have to be produced. Otherwise - as somebody said - "That which is stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
YOU have not questioned or acknowledged ANY issues related to the Covid Vaccines, in which they actually are gene therapies, NOT Vaccines.
YOU ignore facts.
YOU cherry pick data, by stage.
YOU dismiss FACTS as they inconvenience YOUR conclusions.
YOU are an easily discernable Agent of Misdirection.
FURTHERMORE
Is it lost on you that we live in the information age and NOT one News Network or Media Network covered the progression of Covid Vaccination Trials, from the beginning? I would have expected a live Documentary to be presented in this era of the Reality Show.
However, News and Media were lightning fast on presenting a pre-assigned narrative, from the beginning. Of which, they failed to present an accurate account of origin OR progression. Of which they, have flip flopped on a regular basis, in response to noticed anomalies.
Grey's Anatomy and several other "shows", that are created and aired by the same Networks that present our "News", left no time in presenting a pre-dispositioned narrative of events and conclusions, with NO factual data to represent those views clearly defined.
In many cases BOTH News and Media afforded an inaccurate set of criteria while at the same time stating "the science is ever changing" as an excuse.
This occurred while ZERO in depth coverage was offered of on the ground events at the same time, before and after, and continues to this day.
My toleration for incompetence and those who excuse it is gone.
ADDITIONALLY,
PLEASE view the Total Death rate of Canada over the last 20 years and that of 2020 and you will note NO SIGNIFICANT change to the TOTAL. Be sure to account for incremental increase due to the Boomer generation entering die off as that is the trend in play.
GO MANIPULATE somewhere else. YOU are a bad faith actor, here with a maligned purpose.
IN OTHER WORDS. FUCK OFF, YOU ARE A LIAR.
Historical Data is raw data.
Projections are calculated data.
Macrotrends provided BOTH.
Impacts of Covid-19 were not isolated from within the Historic data and not added to the projected data.
Your understanding of those 2 terms and the disclaimer is flawed.
No, you're just wrong. Here is an archive from November 2020.
https://archive.is/wxK9S
Look, they have the same projected death rate for 2020 as currently. The 2020 death rate you see on their website is a projected one. It's not historical data. Learn to read.
I suppose these stats are wrong too ?
https://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=ca&v=26
https://www.google.ca/amp/knoema.com/atlas/Canada/Death-rate%3fmode=amp
They use the CIA Factbook from 2020 as source, speak their 2020 numbers are projections and not real data.
https://imgur.com/8hPxIRg.png
Even worse. They use almost 3 year old data, unless you think they know somehow the "historical" death rate of Canada in 2020 from a data set which was released in 2019.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210310/dq210310c-eng.htm
https://files.catbox.moe/pzs0xj.jpg
It's funny how Statisca and Macrotrends match the 296,373 at the end of 2020 and the upward trend matches the trend identified in their projections but you can accept the backflips presented that Covid resulted in a notable increase to overall Death Totals.
The Death Total increases are within the expectations that were ALREADY projected prior to Covid.
Compare the numbers of all. They don't change but the accessment has.