Hurrdurr
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
That was just a review if the ban on funding gain-of-function research should be lifted or not. In December of 2017, 11 months after Trump's inauguration, it was decided to lift the ban.
Yes, because they presumably have to complete a review process before they can lift such a ban.
And that process to lift the ban was initiated nine days before Trump took office.
And then a pandemic that appears to have been created by the very gain of function research this move authorized appeared at the top of the next election year destroying Trump's economy and necessitating mass mail-in voting which is notoriously vulnerable to fraud.
Oh, and the US deep state apparently funded the engineering of that virus. That's the same US deep state that tried everything short of just killing him to unseat Trump, before he could "drain the swamp (meaning them)". That's the same deep state that killed JFK for largely the same reasons, i.e. because he stood against the deep state.
It's all very fishy.
Trump could have easily won the election if he endorsed mail-in voting like the Democrats. He would have easily gained the votes he was missing to win some key states.
It wasn't a secret that the US lifted the ban. Trump and his handlers could have done something. If Obama was able to ban funding for it, Trump would have been too.
Nobody knew the Washington establishment would go so far as to attack the entire world with a bioweapon to get Trump out of office in 2020.
Washington establishment wouldn't care for a ban either. If the "Deep State" was out for Trump, a ban on gain-of-function research wouldn't have mattered. They would have done it either way.