As Jordan Peterson put it, a multifactor analysis reveals that gender as of itself is not correlated strongly with salary in a specific field. Personality is, and women have less assertive, more agreeable personalities. They also prioritize family more. But I'm not surprised the left is not willing to see an explanation for any outcome they don't like.
In other words, employers can't just calibrate salaries for women and men in the exact same positions. They will instead have to identify all roles in their organizations that provide similar levels of value, and then increase salaries when jobs are found to be underpaid.
And you can be damned sure the HR will overvalue its own work and devalue the work of people actually sweating and producing.
Most women are grifters that get by with social skills. Our enemies are the ugly, the obese, the vapid, the childless, and the ambitious backstabbers most of all. Simpin aint pimpin, especially in the workplace.
"We see women occupying professions in caregiving, in services, and those professions have predominantly been undervalued,"
Women are biologically drawn to professions in caregiving. If they choose that as a career, there is a trade off of doing what they love for less pay.
Professions such as caregiving are not undervalued, they are undercut by a majority workforce of new immigrants and temporary foreign workers who are willing to do caregiving jobs for low wages.
Employers will have to consider the "skill, effort, responsibilities, and working conditions of those jobs," says the legislation."
No shit that's how every job's wage is determined
Now can the government define what a woman is? So that I may pay her/xer/zem a little bit more than the other genders?
As Jordan Peterson put it, a multifactor analysis reveals that gender as of itself is not correlated strongly with salary in a specific field. Personality is, and women have less assertive, more agreeable personalities. They also prioritize family more. But I'm not surprised the left is not willing to see an explanation for any outcome they don't like.
And you can be damned sure the HR will overvalue its own work and devalue the work of people actually sweating and producing.
Most women are grifters that get by with social skills. Our enemies are the ugly, the obese, the vapid, the childless, and the ambitious backstabbers most of all. Simpin aint pimpin, especially in the workplace.
Women are biologically drawn to professions in caregiving. If they choose that as a career, there is a trade off of doing what they love for less pay.
Professions such as caregiving are not undervalued, they are undercut by a majority workforce of new immigrants and temporary foreign workers who are willing to do caregiving jobs for low wages.
Employers will have to consider the "skill, effort, responsibilities, and working conditions of those jobs," says the legislation." No shit that's how every job's wage is determined
Sorry, trades have too many white men to care.