I don't have to "prove" a negative. That's not how it works. If someone's going to claim there was a CPC sign at some undisclosed address, the burden of proof is on him.
Without knowing the address and having surveillance footage of the relevant area for the relevant time, his claim is unfalsifiable and therefore worthless.
It's like me saying you flashed your pecker at me, offering no proof, and not even saying where or when it happened. In that scenario, you can't even prove you were somewhere else at the time because no time or place has been provided in the accusation. The accusation in that case is worthless without proof.
That's right, a CPC smear on CBC is hardly shocking.
Also wouldn't surprise me if the founder of Ekos, who has been donating to the Liberals since 2003, is pushing Bernier numbers up so NDP voters get scared and switch their votes to the Liberals.
no need to guess, says they had a conservative sign on their lawn.
And he can prove this?
Yeah, because PPCers wound never throw things at candidates.
I don't have to "prove" a negative. That's not how it works. If someone's going to claim there was a CPC sign at some undisclosed address, the burden of proof is on him.
Without knowing the address and having surveillance footage of the relevant area for the relevant time, his claim is unfalsifiable and therefore worthless.
It's like me saying you flashed your pecker at me, offering no proof, and not even saying where or when it happened. In that scenario, you can't even prove you were somewhere else at the time because no time or place has been provided in the accusation. The accusation in that case is worthless without proof.
That's right, a CPC smear on CBC is hardly shocking.
Also wouldn't surprise me if the founder of Ekos, who has been donating to the Liberals since 2003, is pushing Bernier numbers up so NDP voters get scared and switch their votes to the Liberals.