Using 'nurse' in the organization name of 'Canadian Frontline Nurses' is misleading because the nurses leading the organization have either been fired for speaking out against C19 measures or are not currently practicing?
The article doesn't make that claim. They acknowledge that they are nurses and they acknowledge that there are nurses who are against vaccines.
It's right in the article: "the use of the word “nurse” in the bios of CFN’s founders and the group’s name itself lends a misplaced impression of credibility." Also: ""It's dangerous to put that title out there, meaning a nurse title, which obviously carries meaning for the public and then misrepresents truth or science," Villeneuve said."
Misplaced credibility != using nurse to mislead.
Finally, the subtitle of the article suggests that those behind the group are not actually nurses.
How can you say that when they literally call them nurses.
The article doesn't make that claim. They acknowledge that they are nurses and they acknowledge that there are nurses who are against vaccines.
Misplaced credibility != using nurse to mislead.
How can you say that when they literally call them nurses.