Segregation: 1921 vs 2021
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Are you aware that they gave ivermectin to most of the states in India? This marked a noticeable downturn in covid case. some provinces noted a 95% reduction in new covid cases. Other states that bought into the hoax that ivermectin is dangerous saw an increase in cases over the same time.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. I never demanded anything of anyone.
Well in the real world before it turned into clown world a real vaccine would do better than a half assed job of preventing infection and spread, and would typically last a lifetime.
Yea it makes way more sense that the experimental MRNA vaccine caused the rapid mutations of the genetically engineered covid virus
Show me the data on ivermectin in India. There are a bunch of stories but I haven't seen any studies about its effectiveness. How much did India have? How much did they give out? I quoted you a source with a number of other reasons for the current story in India, none of which needed ivermectin. And your response was "blah blah blah". Impressive. You're full of opinions but short on evidence.
Before we get too far past it I want to repeat a question you didn't respond to. The only support you provided for those opinions was an article that says:
======= "people infected with the delta variant can carry detectable viral loads similar to those of people who are unvaccinated, though in the vaccinated, these levels rapidly diminish. There is also some question about how cultivatable — or viable — this virus retrieved from vaccinated people actually is."
and
"it’s important to keep three things in mind:
Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease.
Breakthrough infections among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon.
The majority of new COVID-19 infections in the US are among unvaccinated people."
=======
How can you take that and use it to say "I don't need to get vaccinated."?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-shopper/2021/09/27/best-smart-door-locks/?sh=3d2c01835331 https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTtu_Xho_gI&t=42s https://ivmmeta.com/
ok, I concede the vaccine is highly effective. I still won't get it.
are you going to REEEEEEE now that I am literally killing innocent vaccinated people?
If you do, you don't actually believe the vaccines are highly effective.
This site is 100% anonymous. It claims to be maintained by "PhD researchers, scientists, people who hope to make a contribution" (https://ivmmeta.com/faq.html) but there appears to be no way to verify that.
At the same time there are complaints about ivmmeta's methodology from people who seem to know what they're talking about and who are not anonymous: https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111678, https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking/ivermectin-convalescent-plasma-and-hydroxychloroquine-one-year-rotten-apples, https://opmed.doximity.com/articles/will-ivermectin-cure-covid-19?_csrf_attempted=yes
"The 8 Best Smart Door Locks That Make Traditional Keys Obsolete"
Huh?
I asked for studies, not opinions in a minor publication with a crappy reputation (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-desert-review-bias/). That said, the article contains a link to a paper from 13 months ago that talks about how to keep people from plugging up healthcare facilities. It recommends mask-wearing, hand-washing, social distancing, etc. plus a bunch of already existing drugs that they think might help keep people out of the hospital, but it's all very tentative because, well, it's from 13 months ago. And it makes no mention of ivermectin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTtu_Xho_gI&t=42s
Not a particularly sterling character, eh? Proponent of the discredited Marik Protocol, unable to get his ivermectin study published in a proper journal due to “a series of strong, unsupported claims based on studies with insufficient statistical significance, and at times, without the use of control groups.” (https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/frontiers-removes-controversial-ivermectin-paper-pre-publication-68505) So he gets his questionable views out on Youtube, which - as we all know - publishes just about anything.
https://ivmmeta.com/
That one shows promise. I looked at it some months ago and stopped after finding a study that found no improvement and another that claimed to be peer reviewed but wasn't. But it's time to look at it again. I see it now has a lot of randomized controlled trials listed. Thank you.
What?
They are only "highly effective" in the people who get them. The people who don't , well, they spread the virus.