They're not, they believe what they're saying, because they're only going on what they're told to say or the info they're provided. If somebody dies because of something that potentially could have resulted from being vaccinated but there is no investigation and the official cause of death is recorded as something else, there's no way of knowing if the death was vaccine related and any "expert" can simply say it wasn't.
You appear to be saying that when all the results are in and all the numbers are compiled some guy in a dark suit and sunglasses steps though the door and tells the researchers what the results mean.
That's your Hollywood version. If you're completely unwilling to acknowledge or simply ignorant of how the truth is manipulated during a "crisis" there's no point trying to reason with you. Canada went through this before, during WW1 and WW2. In particular you can educate yourself about government control of "the message" during WW1 by researching somebody named Ernest J. Chambers.
No fair dodging. When the data comes in and the study authors have their numbers, how do you propose that the results are changed to suit your narrative?
I suspect you don't know how much documentation there is on these studies as they progress. To imagine that they're being subverted somehow is to admit you think Mission Impossible movies are documentaries.
They're not, they believe what they're saying, because they're only going on what they're told to say or the info they're provided. If somebody dies because of something that potentially could have resulted from being vaccinated but there is no investigation and the official cause of death is recorded as something else, there's no way of knowing if the death was vaccine related and any "expert" can simply say it wasn't.
They are not being told. They are the tellers.
There are trials with 60,000 participants (https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/fourth-large-scale-covid-19-vaccine-trial-begins-united-states) and a study involving 500,000 individuals (https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0514-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness.html)
You appear to be saying that when all the results are in and all the numbers are compiled some guy in a dark suit and sunglasses steps though the door and tells the researchers what the results mean.
I don't think so.
That's your Hollywood version. If you're completely unwilling to acknowledge or simply ignorant of how the truth is manipulated during a "crisis" there's no point trying to reason with you. Canada went through this before, during WW1 and WW2. In particular you can educate yourself about government control of "the message" during WW1 by researching somebody named Ernest J. Chambers.
No fair dodging. When the data comes in and the study authors have their numbers, how do you propose that the results are changed to suit your narrative?
I suspect you don't know how much documentation there is on these studies as they progress. To imagine that they're being subverted somehow is to admit you think Mission Impossible movies are documentaries.