And are they allowed to put people in these camps under that new emergency order that was decreed?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
And are they allowed to put people in these camps under that new emergency order that was decreed?
It's literally in the textbook. Open any molecular biology textbook. Or even grade 11 biology. Even wikipedia can tell you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcription_(biology)
But go ahead and trust the people who are paid to support a narrative.
I'm far from the only person being honest about it. See this open letter for example
https://doctors4covidethics.org/open-letter-to-mcmaster-university-a-good-faith-letter-in-defense-of-research-ethics-and-human-dignity/
You ignorance doesn't change reality. The reason you want me to piss off is because I know what i'm talking about and you can't challenge fact. Trying to say this is not a gene therapy is like saying the earth is flat and 2+2=5.
Brave of you to put Wikipedia and your Grade 11 biology text up against the education and experience of the world's medical community.
As for Britz-McKibbin's letter...
This is acquired by contracting covid. Plugging ICUs and storing bodies in refrigerated vans are what we are trying to avoid.
The proof is in the hospitalization figures. In general a large majority of the patients in hospital with covid are victims from the small minority of unvaccinated individuals. See Ontario's numbers, for example: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data
There is no global insurance policy against global pandemics. Asking to be insured against the risk is a pipe dream.
This is the Nuremberg Code argument, and it applies in trials. The trials are over and the vaccines are generally recognized as safe.
Infected unvaccinated people tie up more of healthcare systems' resources, and therefore need to be identified as quickly as possible to limit the spread of the virus and avoid the load on the healthcare system. Plus there appears to be emerging evidence that unvaccinated people are better at spreading the virus. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2294250-how-much-less-likely-are-you-to-spread-covid-19-if-youre-vaccinated/
it's still a gene therapy and you are cherrypicking data
check out Israel or the UK high vaccination rates high case loads
also Canadian data counts double vaccinated as unvaccinated if it's within two weeks of second dose and is misleading.
The long term data from trials is by definition not available. We also have high myocarditis rates in young people that are not justified given the covid risk.
your assinine attempt at claiming the 'worlds medical community' is behind you is laughable given the 'consensus' is manufactured through overt censorship and bias with a profit motive.
Not to mention complete ignorance of herd immunity and the natural tendency of viruses to become easily transmissible and less deadly due to selective pressure.
It is not a vaccine. It is a gene therapy. None of your nonsense refutes that. You simple attempt to say 'WELL WE ALL AGREE UP IS DOWN SO IT IS!"
faggot
How are you and your buddies at the troll factory doing? still getting 5 rubles per post?
You're the one with a Grade 11 Biology textbook for backup. Good luck.