To say otherwise is the same as saying that a cold winter is evidence against man-made global warming. A single data point, they keep reminding us, is not sufficient evidence against global warming. So why isn't the opposite also true? A single data point, like the Lytton fire, is not evidence of man-made global warming.
There have been catastrophic forest fires in BC, and anywhere there are trees, for a long time. The Canadian media and the Canadian government are using this tragedy to push their agenda, and only an idiot would be fooled by this nonsense.
Climate change is real, but we really haven't seen any effects yet. Everything "they" point to now as examples of climate change isn't - it's just normal.
What sort of “man made climate change” can you show evidence for?
You need this.
I just said we haven't seen any yet.
Weather predictions come from observing atmospheric conditions. Atmospheric CO2 is at levels unprecedented for humans. Result? We'll see.