there was every indication that it was false back in March/April 2020 because somebody actually did some reporting and it was actually in the news briefly.
Who did some reporting? Show me, don't just tell me. Otherwise you could be making it up.
It was actually in the news briefly.
Where? When? Show me, don't just tell me. Otherwise you could be making it up.
You saying some stuff is not good enough without a link to some kind of proof.
Wow. Most provinces have conservative governments, right?
From your link: "The blood clots, according to experts, are incredibly rare, appearing in one of every 250,000 receivers of the vaccine and causing only one death in a million AstraZeneca vaccine takers"
One death in a million. Compare that to roughly one death in 50 people who get the virus.
It's not the vaccine rather how it's improperly administered. If injected directly into the bloodstream it will increase chances of clotting. It could take awhile for the clotting to develop into more serious health issues, so much so that the health issue won't be linked to the vaccine injection.
Blood vessels in muscles are called capillaries and they are about 10 microns in diameter. That's 0.0004" or four ten thousandths of an inch. (https://www.britannica.com/science/capillary) That's about half the diameter of a human hair. Far too small for a vaccine needle to pierce because the needle is 50 times bigger.
You lost me. Let's start over. You said:
Who did some reporting? Show me, don't just tell me. Otherwise you could be making it up.
Where? When? Show me, don't just tell me. Otherwise you could be making it up.
You saying some stuff is not good enough without a link to some kind of proof.
Yes, all pulling in different directions: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-03/BSG-WP-2021-039.pdf - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.708903/full. What does that have to do with the CBC's reporting on social distancing?
Yeah, you're lost alright.
And you're still Mr. Anonymous Internet Poster with lots of opinions and no proof, spreading misinformation on the Internet.
I never liked my middle name growing up, if only my parents would have known what it would come to mean in the 90s...
Now THAT was funny! Thanks for the chuckle :-)
From your link: "The blood clots, according to experts, are incredibly rare, appearing in one of every 250,000 receivers of the vaccine and causing only one death in a million AstraZeneca vaccine takers"
One death in a million. Compare that to roughly one death in 50 people who get the virus.
It's not the vaccine rather how it's improperly administered. If injected directly into the bloodstream it will increase chances of clotting. It could take awhile for the clotting to develop into more serious health issues, so much so that the health issue won't be linked to the vaccine injection.
You are going to need to provide evidence that that happens.
When medication is to be delivered into the bloodstream it is commonly injected into a vein on the inside of the elbow. Unlike that, these vaccine are injected into the muscle of the upper arm because it's the best place for activating the immune system. https://theconversation.com/why-do-we-get-shots-in-the-arm-its-all-about-the-muscle-161259
Blood vessels in muscles are called capillaries and they are about 10 microns in diameter. That's 0.0004" or four ten thousandths of an inch. (https://www.britannica.com/science/capillary) That's about half the diameter of a human hair. Far too small for a vaccine needle to pierce because the needle is 50 times bigger.
And as I pointed out earlier your own link says "The blood clots, according to experts, are incredibly rare, appearing in one of every 250,000 receivers of the vaccine and causing only one death in a million AstraZeneca vaccine takers" https://www.google.com/amp/s/nationalpost.com/news/canada/adenovirus-in-astrazeneca-vaccine-behind-trigger-for-extremely-rare-blood-clots-scientists/wcm/b1d1e0df-8989-41b0-a029-875585bfb5ec/amp/