You really, honestly believe Trudeau's propaganda, eh? Settled to save money. That wasn't even his first excuse. It was his final excuse, after the first few didn't hold up to popular opinion.
A child associated with an armed force or armed group refers to any person below 18 years of age who is, or who has been, recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, spies or for sexual purposes.
(Source: Paris Principles on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict 2007)
It got up my nose too, as I'm normal.
You really, honestly believe Trudeau's propaganda, eh? Settled to save money. That wasn't even his first excuse. It was his final excuse, after the first few didn't hold up to popular opinion.
He was 15. Doesn't mean anything to you, obviously, but there's a framework for making these decisions.
https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/six-grave-violations/child-soldiers/
Definition of a child soldier
A child associated with an armed force or armed group refers to any person below 18 years of age who is, or who has been, recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, spies or for sexual purposes. (Source: Paris Principles on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict 2007)
Do you even know what khadr’s lawsuit was for? If so, you would not be giving me the definition of child soldier.
Confirmed that you blindly trust Trudeau’s propoganda.
It's publicly available. No mystery there.
Some people - and governments - know how to pick their battles. You should study up on that.
Of course it’s publicly available. You went off on a tangent to deflect what the lawsuit was for because your arguments would be quashed, otherwise.