Except, of course, that virtually none of the "Peer reviewed studies, data, observations, experiences, easily verifiable information" makes it into the OmegaCanada discussions.
Instead we get personal opinions unsupported by any kind of reference material. The journals and papers from the institutions most qualified to publish are only referenced if they can be misinterpreted, and their conclusions are ignored.
Except, of course, that virtually none of the "Peer reviewed studies, data, observations, experiences, easily verifiable information" makes it into the OmegaCanada discussions.
Instead we get personal opinions unsupported by any kind of reference material. The journals and papers from the institutions most qualified to publish are only referenced if they can be misinterpreted, and their conclusions are ignored.