Man I tried my hardest to be nice, but it didn't work. You don't seem to understand math. This is me, actually agreeing with your ultimate point, while stating that the way you are describing suggests that you really don't understand.
It is not 50% of cases coming from 14% of the population, it's 21%, from 10-14%, which still benefits your argument. Yet you stand here, still, arguing 50%, notwithstanding the fact that you are describing that numbers that contradict your own argument.
It is not 50% of cases coming from 14% of the population, it's [......etc]
My numbers come from https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data. Never mind the numbers, just look at the size of the slices of the pie. Hospitalized / in ICU - huge slices for the unvaxxed. Vaccination progress - tiny slices for the unvaxxed.
I don't see any slices that correspond to your numbers so perhaps you can enlighten me. Where do yours come from?
Way more than twice. If 50% of your cases are coming from 14% of your population it's telling you something. Maybe you'll listen, maybe you won't.
Man I tried my hardest to be nice, but it didn't work. You don't seem to understand math. This is me, actually agreeing with your ultimate point, while stating that the way you are describing suggests that you really don't understand.
It is not 50% of cases coming from 14% of the population, it's 21%, from 10-14%, which still benefits your argument. Yet you stand here, still, arguing 50%, notwithstanding the fact that you are describing that numbers that contradict your own argument.
I appreciate your efforts.
My numbers come from https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data. Never mind the numbers, just look at the size of the slices of the pie. Hospitalized / in ICU - huge slices for the unvaxxed. Vaccination progress - tiny slices for the unvaxxed.
I don't see any slices that correspond to your numbers so perhaps you can enlighten me. Where do yours come from?