I watched that the other day. Mr. Sloan had three guest speakers.
Dr. Bridle is an academic whose specialty is cancer research. He is suggesting that the vaccines should not have been released without further testing. Some are mad at him for suggesting that. The question of how many more people would have died while the vaccine release was delayed didn't come up.
Dr. Phillips has been a doctor for 5 years and has a small family practise office in a little town in rural Canada. He not a heavyweight when it comes to discussing brand new global pandemics.
Dr. Welsh is another academic with no expertise in public health or infectious diseases. His "research focuses on the basis of vessel contractility and how ion channels and gap junctions (intercellular pores) control the electrical activity of smooth muscle/endothelial cells." (https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/physpharm/people/faculty/Bio%20Pages/welsh_don.html). He read a prepared statement for a little over three minutes, disagreeing with the government's response and calling for a Royal Commission into it.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is that millions of health professionals around the world appear to be in rough agreement - not lockstep, for sure, but implementing similar measures - about how to respond to the pandemic. I reject the idea that they are all either in on a grand conspiracy or too stupid to know they are being used.
Still you as far as I can tell. The people who administer the shots aren't the people who see the hospital patients. Community health and hospitals are two different branches. The paths to and from the federal data banks are separate.
Bullshit. The Adverse Events Following Immunization is Health Canada. The vaccine is administered by each province and territory.
You gotta stop making shit up.
From your link:
"PHUs investigate and assess all AEFI reports"
Ontario has 34 Public Health Units
So all those people (including physicians, nurse practitioners or pharmacists) https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/oph_standards/docs/aefi_cd.pdf are in on this conspiracy?
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." - Hitchens
I watched that the other day. Mr. Sloan had three guest speakers.
Dr. Bridle is an academic whose specialty is cancer research. He is suggesting that the vaccines should not have been released without further testing. Some are mad at him for suggesting that. The question of how many more people would have died while the vaccine release was delayed didn't come up.
Dr. Phillips has been a doctor for 5 years and has a small family practise office in a little town in rural Canada. He not a heavyweight when it comes to discussing brand new global pandemics.
Dr. Welsh is another academic with no expertise in public health or infectious diseases. His "research focuses on the basis of vessel contractility and how ion channels and gap junctions (intercellular pores) control the electrical activity of smooth muscle/endothelial cells." (https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/physpharm/people/faculty/Bio%20Pages/welsh_don.html). He read a prepared statement for a little over three minutes, disagreeing with the government's response and calling for a Royal Commission into it.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is that millions of health professionals around the world appear to be in rough agreement - not lockstep, for sure, but implementing similar measures - about how to respond to the pandemic. I reject the idea that they are all either in on a grand conspiracy or too stupid to know they are being used.
Still you as far as I can tell. The people who administer the shots aren't the people who see the hospital patients. Community health and hospitals are two different branches. The paths to and from the federal data banks are separate.
Hallelujah! Something more than an opinion.
Except for that, of course. What makes you say that?