The vaccine experiment has failed like some experts predicted it would. There is a reason vaccines take 5+ years to develop.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Hitchen's razor - "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
I think they used to call this Yellow Journalism.
This is not news. The CDC has regularly mentioned the fact that the vaccines do not completely prevent transmission. Even Pfizer in November 2020 did not claim 100% success during their initial trials. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
The CDC did not "quietly admit" transmission. It's been reporting it as a regular metric since the beginning. For example: "The immunity provided by vaccine and prior infection are both high but not complete" https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/vaccine-induced-immunity.html
Duh. "CDC quietly admits the vulnerable are more at risk". What a stupid thing to imply. Who hasn't known that from the beginning?
Deaths with covid go - or used to go, prior to Omicon, since we can't count all the cases any more - in the "contact tracing" column. Deaths from covid go in the "would have lived but they had covid" column.
Creating confusion over the two seems to be a favourite tactic of you and your friends. As if it mattered anyway, with a million more deaths than expected in the US and only 800,000 of them officially attributed to covid. https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid#estimated-excess-mortality-from-the-economist
Hitchen's razor - "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."