He can’t deny it, only say “but but they should get vaxxed to lower their risk further”
Their risk is already lower than yours. You should be the one locked at home to protect the hospitals not them.
He can’t deny it, only say “but but they should get vaxxed to lower their risk further”
Their risk is already lower than yours. You should be the one locked at home to protect the hospitals not them.
It’s one of the easiest ways to expose how deeply political and unscientific your positions/opinions are.
Of course you can’t comprehend why some people would thing differently to you, and you want them punished regardless of the science.
When a medical expert says “we can’t ignore natural immunity” and that “Europe got it right”, and you disagree with her. That’s unscientific politics.
Your politics of discrimination and division tactics is reminiscent of some of the worse regimes.
Nah. It's more like promotion of quarantine, except the people with restricted movements are being protected from the disease.
Exactly, your politics.
I’m in the politics of diversity of opinion, respecting the charter of rights, free speech, free movement, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly etc.
You’re on the side of regimes like CCP former USSR etc
I'd say you have a foot on each horse. You want all the benefits of socialized medicine and all the freedom of no obligations to follow its guidelines if you don't like them.
I want socialized medicine gone.