A look behind who is on the Ontario Science Board
(canucklaw.ca)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Whos byline is on that paycheck? I'd like to know who wrote it.
There is none because it is propaganda
There are no monsters under your bed.
If the conspiracy folks are right (and they are batting 1000 these days) this will be the biggest tragedy in quite a long time.
The emotional impact for the average person who administered these gene therapies to children and young adults will send many over the edge.
Pfizer admitted that these are considered gene therapies and would not be possible to use without contracted emergency use:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938284/
In the above link Gene-based vaccines (which include, among others, mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines) carry genetic instructions for the production of an antigen by the cells of the vaccine recipient. For coronavirus vaccines, the target antigen is the surface spike protein, which is used by the virus to bind and fuse with host cells
It has been shown that gene therapies can cause cancer: https://www.nature.com/articles/3301946
So do I feel that there is a monster under my bed? No.
But I do feel that you may be standing on a beach wondering why the tide has pulled out as the tidal wave approaches
That's not an admission. It's an announcement. There's a difference. As of last year there were over 1800 candidates for gene therapy. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg1829. You are free to believe the sky is falling.
And not everyone wearing a seat belt survives an accident. Should we stop using them? There was an accident on the bridge but the river has crocodiles - are you going to swim?
So why don't they call it a gene therapy instead of refering to it as a vaccine? Why did they work to reframe the term vaccine to include gene therapies? Why didn't they tell people of the risks of gene therapy instead of messaging "safe and effective"? Because they are liars?