Youre the only one between both of us who admitted you know nothing about science.

And do you think that this means that you do know something about science? Because you don't admit that you don't? It's obvious you don't because you keep posting stuff that contradicts what you're saying. I'll just repeat the list from my last response:

This quote is from a link you sent: ""You can reduce your risk of an unpleasant, severe or deadly illness by at least three-quarters and up to 90 per cent if you get vaccinated," https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/vaccinated-hospital-patients-outpace-the-unvaccinated-but-it-doesn-t-mean-the-shots-don-t-work-experts-1.5730793

This quote is from a link you sent: "It is therefore strongly recommended that you get vaccinated and receive the booster dose." https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/health-issues/a-z/2019-coronavirus/people-adequately-protected-against-covid-19

This quote is from a link in an article you sent: "Conclusions: Through 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing Covid-19." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34525277/

This quote is from a second link in the same article: "Conclusions: The mRNA-1273 vaccine continued to be efficacious in preventing Covid-19 illness and severe disease at more than 5 months, with an acceptable safety profile, and protection against asymptomatic infection was observed." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017