And it wasn’t before the graphs of vaccinated vs unvaccinated infection rates crossed in mid-December. That variable remains constant. The law of large numbers still applies.
And we're supposed to just take your word on this
No. People are free to get their own math training.
before the graphs of vaccinated vs unvaccinated infection rates crossed in mid-December.
At which point the case counts decoupled from the hospitalization and ICU bed counts, ceased to be an indicator for impact on the healthcare system, and became - as with the flu - largely meaningless for the purposes of planning.
But you go ahead and apply your random number rules to non-random events. They don't matter in the real world anyway,
And it wasn’t before the graphs of vaccinated vs unvaccinated infection rates crossed in mid-December. That variable remains constant. The law of large numbers still applies.
No. People are free to get their own math training.
At which point the case counts decoupled from the hospitalization and ICU bed counts, ceased to be an indicator for impact on the healthcare system, and became - as with the flu - largely meaningless for the purposes of planning.
But you go ahead and apply your random number rules to non-random events. They don't matter in the real world anyway,
Stats don’t go as expected, so they cease to be an indicator. Of course.
They cease to be an indicator when they cease to be an indicator. That would be when omicron arrived.
…Cease to be an indicator when the stats don’t say what you want them to say.