I'm glad we agree unsupported opinions don't carry any weight. Perhaps we'll see more support from you for yours in the future.
National Data speaks for itself.
You seem to be arguing that all the people who don't believe covid is dangerous are all getting tested for it anyway, and I think that's silly. I don't believe those people get tested. I can't find a study or paper that says people who don't believe covid is dangerous don't get tested, and I don't believe you think they all get tested either.
So either you don't understand that bad stats will lead to bad Walgreens graphs, or you do understand it but use the graphs anyway.
Your quote “The stats aren’t cooked, the reporting is inaccurate”. So you know the reporting is false. And you are ok with it.
You seem to be having trouble with English. Is it because your first language is Russian? Chinese? Once more: you presented the stats, I said they weren't accurate. How you can turn that into me supporting the stats is a mystery to me.
Why are you so angry Tuchodi when National Data proves that THE FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION? Why does this make you so emotional and angry?
What fact?
One of your unsupported opinions? One of your pictures from some sketchy web site?
Why are you ok with stats being reported “inaccurately” and why do you agree with the fully vaccinated being falsely reported as unvaccinated?
WHY ARE YOU UNABLE TO EXPLAIN THIS?
We're only talking about them because you presented them. I'm just pointing out that conclusions drawn from them are invalid.
Where is this happening?
Your unsupported opinion is worthless.
National Data speaks for itself.
Your quote “The stats aren’t cooked, the reporting is inaccurate”
So you know the reporting is false. And you are ok with it.
Own it, your words. You’re exposed for the fraud you are.
I'm glad we agree unsupported opinions don't carry any weight. Perhaps we'll see more support from you for yours in the future.
You seem to be arguing that all the people who don't believe covid is dangerous are all getting tested for it anyway, and I think that's silly. I don't believe those people get tested. I can't find a study or paper that says people who don't believe covid is dangerous don't get tested, and I don't believe you think they all get tested either.
So either you don't understand that bad stats will lead to bad Walgreens graphs, or you do understand it but use the graphs anyway.
You seem to be having trouble with English. Is it because your first language is Russian? Chinese? Once more: you presented the stats, I said they weren't accurate. How you can turn that into me supporting the stats is a mystery to me.
Why are you so angry Tuchodi when National Data proves that THE FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION? Why does this make you so emotional and angry?
No need to shout. What makes you say that?
Why are you so triggered by data? Why does National Data make you angry?