"Relative risk" is garbage science. The "total mortality" data is where the truth is at and where the data is crude.
Just like Pfizer’s whole relative vs absolute efficacy with the vaccine trials -> 95% relative and 2% absolute.
All your data is old, Nov 2021. After the booster, so after Dec 2021, the crude data is catastrophic for infection rates in the FULLY vaccinated. In dummy speak, for you Tuchodi, crude means, non fictitious. No manually tampered data.
LEAVE THIS POST UP. AND LET THE LUKERS SEE YOUR FRAUD.
plus one valid minor point: "All your data is old, Nov 2021" It's a minor point because it doesn't matter - the same trends are as true today as they were then.
For example, as of May 11 2022 in the state of Washington:
Unvaccinated 12-34 year-olds in Washington are
• 1.5 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 12-34 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 4.2 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 12-34 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
Unvaccinated 35-64 year-olds are
• 1.9 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 35 - 64 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 4.3 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 35 - 64 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
Unvaccinated 65+ year-olds are
• 2.7 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 3.2 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 3.1 times more likely to die of COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
DOH WA. Website is obliged to list the definition of each variable in this paper:
They are including old data, the paper says Feb 2021 - Dec 2021. So right at the start, you know they are hiding data. Data after Dec 2021 confirms the fully vaxed are getting infected at much higher rates.
Covid positive or Covid case definition: ALL SUSPECTED flu or respiratory illness not confirmed by rapid antigen or by PCR. Anyone showing up at the ED with wheezing and nasal drip might have been counted as a suspected case.
None of the suspected Covid cases were confirmed PCR. Do you find that is scientific Tuchodi? EXPLAIN.
Fraudulent methodology, false conclusions.
I keep having to explain math to you Tuchodi. It’s getting extremely embarrassing for you.
“Estimated Relative Risk”
LOL!
"Relative risk" is garbage science. The "total mortality" data is where the truth is at and where the data is crude.
Just like Pfizer’s whole relative vs absolute efficacy with the vaccine trials -> 95% relative and 2% absolute.
All your data is old, Nov 2021. After the booster, so after Dec 2021, the crude data is catastrophic for infection rates in the FULLY vaccinated. In dummy speak, for you Tuchodi, crude means, non fictitious. No manually tampered data.
LEAVE THIS POST UP. AND LET THE LUKERS SEE YOUR FRAUD.
plus one valid minor point: "All your data is old, Nov 2021" It's a minor point because it doesn't matter - the same trends are as true today as they were then.
For example, as of May 11 2022 in the state of Washington:
Unvaccinated 12-34 year-olds in Washington are
• 1.5 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 12-34 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 4.2 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 12-34 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
Unvaccinated 35-64 year-olds are
• 1.9 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 35 - 64 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 4.3 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 35 - 64 year-olds who have completed the primary series.
Unvaccinated 65+ year-olds are
• 2.7 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 3.2 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
• 3.1 times more likely to die of COVID-19 compared with 65+ year-olds who have completed the primary series.
https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/421-010-CasesInNotFullyVaccinated.pdf
You didnt read the methodology of your own study.
DOH WA. Website is obliged to list the definition of each variable in this paper:
They are including old data, the paper says Feb 2021 - Dec 2021. So right at the start, you know they are hiding data. Data after Dec 2021 confirms the fully vaxed are getting infected at much higher rates.
Covid positive or Covid case definition: ALL SUSPECTED flu or respiratory illness not confirmed by rapid antigen or by PCR. Anyone showing up at the ED with wheezing and nasal drip might have been counted as a suspected case.
None of the suspected Covid cases were confirmed PCR. Do you find that is scientific Tuchodi? EXPLAIN.
Fraudulent methodology, false conclusions.
I keep having to explain math to you Tuchodi. It’s getting extremely embarrassing for you.
Got link for those claims?