Of course we already knew this, but it’s a simple message.
If the bans were effective, they would be happy to share the evidence.
Since they refuse to provide data it’s obvious they have nothing to do with health.
If they wish to correct the record they can provide the studies.
At least by refusing to provide the data you've admitted there is none.
I don't have any data that says when you're driving 160 mph you're more likely to be injured either.
I know you would never look for proof that vaccines reduce the impact of the virus, so here are a couple of sites in case you can stand to read them: Apr 20, 2022 "COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing severe illness" https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/herd-immunity-and-coronavirus/art-20486808, and "Evidence indicates that vaccines and boosters are effective" https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/vaccines/safety-side-effects.html
Since vaccines are effective at reducing the damage from the virus, and since unvaccinated people generally have more serious reactions to the virus - consider these numbers for an example: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data - it is logical to try to keep unvaccinated people out of situations like public transport where they are more likely to become infected.
You support giving healthy children 600x increased risk of heart disease for a virus they survive 99.999% of the time.
Your opinion is worthless.
More news from the voices in your head. Or perhaps some flaky website full of stories from other anonymous drones like yourself.