:)
What booster are you on Tuchodi?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
And it works. Too bad you continue to look the other way.
07 May 2022 BioMed Central, publisher of scientific journals: "VE against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
April 21, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "A BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 booster after either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 primary course substantially increased protection" https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451
May 4, 2022 New England Journal of Medicine "After two doses, both vaccines were equally effective against severe disease caused by the omicron variant." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202061
Your “studies” count SUSPECTED COVID CASES and SUSPECTED COVID DEATHS”. None of your suspected Covid cases or deaths were PCR tested. Do you find that scientific Tuchodi?
Your scam “studies” have to use OLD 2020 DATA from when EVERYONE WAS UNVACCINATED!!! LOL
You post garbage science and trash methodology that you don’t have a clue how the conclusions were made, you just copy paste a headline. But in reality your study’s method is “inferential, or estimated, or fictitious” and has to use outdated data that hides the real 2022 catastrophic truth. Your data is fraudulent. Just like you.
From the best journals and institutions in the world. Your shit comes in the form of pictures of media articles. You don't know science when it's staring you in the face.
You are angry Tuchodi. There’s no place for emotions in science.
You should be grateful to learn why your data is so flawed and you should be grateful that I’m so patient teaching you basic statistical analysis.
BTW, “Covid Suspected cases” without ever PCR confirming those cases was also the lazy unscientific basis upon which the Pfizer trials were built on. They tried sealing this for 75 years. It would be in your interest to read those papers, to fully understand the fraud you fell for.
Funny, you talk about science bu all you produce are memes and pictures of media articles, and you even try to refer to articles in languages you don't speak.
As if you had a clue. Got a link for that?