The sun would burn out by the time you learned how to do it and then worked your way through the results of observations on almost 3 million cases.
You can claim data from five months ago is irrelevant. Go ahead.
DEFINITION of ‘Death
Here's the complete quote: "Death from COVID-19 was defined as death that resulted from clinically compatible illness in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there was a clear alternative cause of death that could not be related to COVID-19"
catastrophic infection rates in the fully vaccinated after the boosters in December.
Another unsupported opinion. VaC1 is completely ignorant of the notion of citing references.
THE DEATHS IN THIS SO CALLED STUDY WERE NOT EVEN PCR CONFIRMED
No need to shout. You'll get spittle on you. Care to provide a source for this opinion?
Hah!
"2 828 294 participants were assessed" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhl/article/PIIS2666-7568(22)00035-6/fulltext
The sun would burn out by the time you learned how to do it and then worked your way through the results of observations on almost 3 million cases.
You can claim data from five months ago is irrelevant. Go ahead.
Here's the complete quote: "Death from COVID-19 was defined as death that resulted from clinically compatible illness in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there was a clear alternative cause of death that could not be related to COVID-19"
Another unsupported opinion. VaC1 is completely ignorant of the notion of citing references.
No need to shout. You'll get spittle on you. Care to provide a source for this opinion?
^ FRAUDULENT DATA.
^ OUTDATED AND FRAUDULENT DATA
These are your opinions, and as you say: opinions are worthless.
Go get you some science.