11
Comments (115)
sorted by:
6
CanadianRighty [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why does she want them banned? Because she supports Liberal policy above science, even when it violates constitutional rights.

8
squiddlwe 8 points ago +9 / -1

I hope Tuchodi gets the new monkey AIDS and starts bleeding from the arsehole!

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +2 / -9

Because she supports Liberal public health policy

The restrictions - mask use, social distancing, vaccination mandates - were imposed in every jurisdiction in Canada, by every party in power.

above science

You present no science.

it violates constitutional rights

You present no support for that statement either. Where are your court case outcomes?

8
Bannonmeharder 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fuck you commie

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You still here?

Bannonmeharder [S] 5 points 2 months ago +5 / -0

Sure I’ll leave this sub. It’s full of jab shills and CPC shills. It’s an easy choice.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey Jab Shill, you never posted with your sock puppet account since being confronted about refusing your booster.

https://omegacanada.win/u/urallfucked/

You ran away with your tail between your legs, afraid you had to explain why youve been refusing the booster for 6months despite pushing the injection on healthy children.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

(Yawn) Another figment of your imagination. Like everything else you post you can think it but you can't prove it. Fill your boots.

2
Bannonmeharder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still here to be witness to your lies Still here to witness you promote harm and fraud.
Still here to see your retardation in full bloom. You are still beating a dead horse and continue to show how ignorant you are.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

07 May 2022 "VE [Vaccine Effectiveness] against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y

27 April 2022 "Conclusions Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower rates of population level covid-19 mortality and incidence in the US." https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317

8
CanadianRighty [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Only the Liberal Party of Canada bans unvaccinated children from travel and continues to maintain those restrictions without evidence of the benefit. Public heath policy to protect people with a 0% risk makes absolutely no sense.

Section 6 of the charter guarantees the right to enter and leave Canada. Restricting people with 0% risk is not reasonable.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Only the Liberal Party of Canada bans unvaccinated children from travel

So you say. The link you posted says children under 12 years and four months old do not need to be vaccinated https://travel.gc.ca/travel-covid/travel-restrictions/domestic-travel#mandatory

people with a 0% risk makes absolutely no sense

Hundreds have wound up in the ICU and dozens have died, but you like that 0% figure. Those kids don't count for you?

Section 6 of the charter guarantees the right to enter and leave Canada

And section 7 guarantees my right to "security of the person", which I won't have if elective surgeries are postponed because too many beds are taken up by the unvaccinated - for instance today Ontario is reporting 21.36% of the ICU beds are occupied by people from the unvaccinated 10% of the population. https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

Given that unvaccinated people get sicker when they catch covid (May 16 2022 "Fully vaccinated people are also much less likely to be hospitalized or die than people with similar risk factors who are not vaccinated." https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/stats/vbt.html) it makes sense that they be kept out of crowded closed containers where they share the air with others who might be carrying the virus.

5
Pegases 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hundreds have wound up in the ICU and dozens have died, but you like that 0% figure. Those kids don't count for you?

Many more have killed themselves due to depression brought on by lockdowns and mask mandates.

Given that unvaccinated people get sicker when they catch covid

My personal experience with the virus would indicate to me that this is not true.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Many more have killed themselves

Prove that.

My personal experience with the virus would indicate to me that this is not true.

Global data means nothing to you. OK.

March 21, 2022 The Lancet "All vaccines analysed in this study were effective at preventing hospitalisation and death from COVID-19 in fully vaccinated older adults" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhl/article/PIIS2666-7568(22)00035-6/fulltext

2022 Mar National Library of Medicine "We found COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were effective against symptomatic COVID-19 among the immunocompromised patients" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34982962/

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0
  • Hey rat propagandist, why is your data from 2021 and with a “publish date from 2022”? Why are you hiding all the FULLY VACCINATED INFECTIONS that occurred AFTER DECEMBER 2021?

  • Why are you pretending that “PROBABLE COVID” is science??

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

.> why is your data from 2021 and with a “publish date from 2022”?

I'm guessing which paper you're referring to, since you're incapable of referencing what you're talking about. I believe it took them five months to process the results from almost three million files, and two of those months were December and January.

Why are you pretending that “PROBABLE COVID” is science?

All the science says it has killed over six million people. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/

5
Pegases 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://abc7news.com/suicide-covid-19-coronavirus-rates-during-pandemic-death-by/6201962/

All I know Is my buddy who was vaccinated caught the virus, gave it to me and my other buddy who were unvaxxed, and we recovered in a fraction of the time compared to my vaxxed buddy.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

That's a pretty small sample.

2
Bannonmeharder 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don’t care about the Suicide or drug overdoses you be only care about injecting innocent children with toxic poison.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Just reporting the science. Here's some from the last month:

07 May 2022 "VE [Vaccine Effectiveness] against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y

27 April 2022 "Conclusions Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower rates of population level covid-19 mortality and incidence in the US." https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I see the resident rat propagandist is unable to produce any science either that explains why her political party allows the elderly, the obese, the immunosuppressed and the high risk with multiple comorbidities to fly Covid positive.

Lets recap Tuchodi’s contribution to Omega to date:

1- she can’t think for herself because she doesn’t understand science, she doesn’t understand immunology and she doesn’t know the difference between. ‘absolute risk’ and ‘relative risk’, so it is extremely easy to fool her with fraudulent data.

2- she endorses an injection that fails 85% of the fully vaccinated in the ICU, and that gives healthy athletes heart disease, all for a virus that the healthy survive 99.99%.

3- she tries to copy paste old studies from 2021 and hopes no one will notice, she then links fraudulent studies that count “SUSPECTED cases” and “PROBABLE cases” and pretends they are confirmed Covid cases.

4- she enjoys harming the young and healthy. She acknowledges that healthy boys 12-16yo have a 600% higher risk of heart disease and she LOVES this fact.

5- “Fuck the healthy kids” is her motto

6- The CDC counted every single death and hospitalization WITH COVID, regardless if the cause of death was gunshot wound, suicide, drowning, terminal cancers, elderly withdraw care or morbidly obese patients. However, they refuse to count the deaths of young healthy patient with no comorbidites who die WITH a recent COVID VACCINE in their system. Both are WITH and not FROM.
And Tuchodi is unable to explain why they inflate one and hide the other.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Just stopping in to point out that OP doesn't supply a single link to support anything they're saying.

You're just supposed to believe them, and not argue..

5
VaxedAndContagious1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Everyone already knows you’re the sucker. A proud sucker who admits she doesn’t understand the State Propaganda she posts.

So you are the perfect sheep. The perfect sucker. You admit you can’t use critical think since the State forbids it.
You admit you don’t have a clue what “Age Standardized Adjustment” you just post it without knowing it’s a fictitious estimate.
You do not have a clue how “Relative risk” is calculated, so you are uninformed and gullible. You are the PERFECT sucker.
You are okay with SUSPECTED and PROBABLE covid counts, and you admit you know that the statistics are quote: “ inaccurate ” .

You are the perfect uneducated sucker for State Propaganda.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You post whatever the voices in your head tell you.

I post reports and studies by scientists and researchers. Like these:

07 May 2022 "VE [Vaccine Effectiveness] against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y

27 April 2022 "Conclusions Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower rates of population level covid-19 mortality and incidence in the US." https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0

^RAT PROPAGANDIST ALERT^

Your “study is fraudulent: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y

*This study estimated relative vaccine effectiveness after it searched databases from December 2019 to November 2021.

Of course you’re hiding the catastrophic data after Nov 2021 Tuchodi, you rat.

NO ONE WAS VACCINATED IN DECEMBER 2020 or FEB 2021 or MARCH 2021. It wasn’t until June 2021 that hospitals started reporting the status of their patients. This is the only way they are able to inflate the “unvaccinated hospitalization”.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

*This study estimated relative vaccine effectiveness after it searched databases from December 2019 to November 2021.

Can't find that quote in the paper. Did you fail at cutting and pasting? Did you just make it up? Doesn't matter anyway, since they started their literature search when covid appeared, in December 2019. It's called covid-19 for a reason.

catastrophic data after Nov 2021

You were going to support that statement some day, I think.

NO ONE WAS VACCINATED IN DECEMBER 2020 or FEB 2021 or MARCH 2021.

The first vaccination in Canada was December 14 2020. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-administration/

You don't research much of what you say, do you? I guess that's why you provide so few links.

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for confirming you are linking fraudulent and outdated statistics from way back December 2020 when 0.001% of the population was vaccinated. You also admit that you have to hide all the statistics after December 2021 because all the fully vaccinated were overwhelmingly getting infected and hospitalized.

Not a good look for you Tuchodi.

. But like you said,: “the statistics aren’t cooked, they’re just inaccurate”.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

all the fully vaccinated were overwhelmingly getting infected and hospitalized.

Still waiting for you to support that. Until then https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j95kNwZw8YY

they’re just inaccurate

It's true. You can't count people who don't show up.

6
ChazzleDazzle 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nobody is this stupid. She's just a troll.

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

0% risk to unvaccinated children

Tell that to the parents of the 44 dead Canadian children.

Or the 606 childrren who wound up in the ICU. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html see Figure 7

5
DoggyDawg 5 points ago +5 / -0

44 kids out of 8 million died, not necessarily of covid, but covid being a contributing factor…

A death due to COVID-19 may be attributed when COVID-19 is the cause of death or is a contributing factor.

The kids were already sick.

Nevertheless, death rate for covid for kids under 20, by loose definition of covid death, is 44-in-8-million. .0005 chance of a kid under 20 dying from covid. That’s virtually 0%.

But, then, everything is relative. How many of these kids would have died regardless? How many were injured by vaccine? None of the answers is zero. But, you’ll never comprehend this because CTV news doesn’t present it to you like this.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

The kids were already sick.

Some of them probably. And they're counted as covid deaths because without covid they would not have died at that point.

How many of these kids would have died regardless?

We don't know, do we?

7
CanadianRighty [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

We know vaccinated elderly people are at a much higher risk of covid than unvaccinated children, yet you want the children banned and the vaccinated elderly given a pass.

Thats not public health policy, that's your nasty politics.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

children banned

Children under 12 years four months are free to travel. https://travel.gc.ca/travel-covid/travel-restrictions/domestic-travel#mandatory

Thats not public health policy

Your opinion is noted.

4
CanadianRighty [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s not an opinion it’s a fact.

Older people are at far greater risk but they’re given a pass.

That’s simply not about health it’s about ultra far left politics.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

It’s not an opinion it’s a fact.

You're quoting the public health policy to me. Calling it politics doesn't change anything.

3
CanadianRighty [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

The policy doesn’t make sense you dolt.

The kids are at lower risk but they’re banned.

The elderly are at vastly higher risk but they’re not banned.

That’s the data.

Anyone with the tiniest shred of intelligence understands this means it’s not about preventing deaths.

7
DoggyDawg 7 points ago +7 / -0

Confirmed, you clueless about stats.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

you clueless about stats.

Says some anonymous nobody on the Internet.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

We’re all anonymous here. That’s the point of this website.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

As long as we realize opinions are worthless and it's the data that matter.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course, as long as you can actually understand the data and not merely regurgitate what CTC News tells you.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

OP likes using 0% too while they rant about segregation and apartheid.

Are you with them on that bullshit too?

6
CanadianRighty [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol she’s so fully deranged that 0.0% isn’t a low enough risk for her.

What a moron.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

So what does your letter to the dead kids' families say?

2
CanadianRighty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does your letter to the 100% of unvaccinated children between 12 and 18 who are at 0.0% risk and can’t travel to funerals and weddings without any scientific evidence to the benefit say?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

.You first.

4
CanadianRighty [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol you’re the drama Queen saying 0% is still too much risk to allow people to travel freely

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

So what does your letter to the dead kids' families say?

7
VaxedAndContagious1 7 points ago +7 / -0

What do you say to the vaccine injured dead kids, Rat Propagandist? You acknowledge the experimental injections cause myocarditis and death in kids. All for a virus they survive 99.99%.

Nice FUCK THE KIDS MOTTO you got there Tuchodi

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

death in kids

Prove that.

2
CanadianRighty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you in favour of allowing children in cars? Because more than 44 of them have died in accidents? So what does your letter to those parents say?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You first.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have no idea what you’re talking about, but i expect you to deflect; it’s what you do.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

OK. We'll just stick to your "Fuck those kids" attitude.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Deflecting again. You sound like a retard.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

You got nothing else, I guess.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

And you retreat to accusations of deflecting when you've got nothing.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey BlackFaceHitler Supporter, produce the science that explains why your political party allows the elderly, the obese, the immunosuppressed and the high risk with multiple comorbidities to fly Covid positive on a plane?

GOT ANY LINKS?

5
VaxedAndContagious1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Btw, why do you draft your propaganda, before posting copy pasting it to Omega?
You’re not fooling anyone.

You failed math, you failed science, you failed statistics and you’re failing badly at being a propagandist.

You even FAILED at using two sock puppet accounts. You just can’t stop failing,

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why you deflect, though?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Doesn't make it any less true.

3
bobbydriscolsgoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did you say 44 dead children? I think more children died from wearing a mask through the pandemic.

Maybe you should check for the number of children that died from strings and strangulation.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5165517/Deaths-window-blinds-need-cord-ban-study-says.html

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I think more children died from wearing a mask through the pandemic.

But you couldn't prove it to save your life.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are strings on masks. I supplied a source that says children choke on strings ergo masks kill children

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You need a source that talks about strings on masks.

3
bobbydriscolsgoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's got a string. The studies say strings can choke kids

5
VaxedAndContagious1 5 points ago +5 / -0

and also, to follow u/tuchodi ‘s example, you have to hide all the data and studies that come out AFTER the data shows how prevalent string deaths are.

So if string deaths skyrocketed after December 2021, hide those, and only link old outdated data from 2020 and stop at November 2021.

Do it, just like u/tuchodi

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

It took 30 years to count 300 string deaths and outlaw all string blinds, strings on hoodies and strings on mittens.

Strings are the silent killer

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was a school in the states that started gluing the masks to the kids. I guess because strings were a deadly weapon but I don't know.

I think they used school glue so no harm I guess. Mostly psychological.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

If only the article actually talked about strings.

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey Bobby, if your study counts SUSPECTED or PROBABLE string deaths without even confirming what the death was caused from, then you’re GOLDEN with u/tuchodi

She only uses estimations, fictional numbers that have never been confirmed clinically

1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know my study uses suspected and probable all the way through.

It's a study not a fact.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

She only uses estimations, fictional numbers that have never been confirmed clinically

The difference is that mine come from establishments using trained and experienced personnel, while yours come from memes and pictures of purported 'news' articles, and often the sources are anonymous. Occasionally there's a shadow of some science but it's misrepresented.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Show me a quote from that article that talks about string.

2
bobbydriscolsgoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

The article says children die from strings. The school boards use a study to outlaw children coming to school with mittens joined by a string. It's settled science.