April 28, 2022 "The primary analysis included 182,122 matched pairs. Relative vaccine effectiveness in days 7 to 30 after the fourth dose was estimated to be 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 47) against polymerase-chain-reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 55% (95% CI, 53 to 58) against symptomatic Covid-19, 68% (95% CI, 59 to 74) against Covid-19–related hospitalization, 62% (95% CI, 50 to 74) against severe Covid-19, and 74% (95% CI, 50 to 90) against Covid-19–related death." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2201688
You got suckered into an experimental injection that Pfizer claimed was safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial and you accepted the injection without the long term safety data.
It's science from the people most qualified to look into it. But it's "propaganda" to you. No wonder you can't find any science to support your fantasies.
You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA
this study you keep linking used old data, hid all the 2022 data and counted suspected and probable covid cases. LOL!
You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA
You've complained about it more often, so it's actually you that keeps mentioning it, although I doubt you could actually link to it.
The lurkers are laughing at you.
You hope.
Your propaganda
The stuff from the New England Journal of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Yale Medical School? You can call it propaganda, go ahead. But who are you? Just another nameless nobody with flaky opinions.l
And you've never claimed one.
I understand the studies that show that overall the vaccines reduce the severity of the covid infection. Studies such as these:
27 April 2022 "Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower rates of population level covid-19 mortality and incidence in the US." https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317
April 28, 2022 "The primary analysis included 182,122 matched pairs. Relative vaccine effectiveness in days 7 to 30 after the fourth dose was estimated to be 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 47) against polymerase-chain-reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 55% (95% CI, 53 to 58) against symptomatic Covid-19, 68% (95% CI, 59 to 74) against Covid-19–related hospitalization, 62% (95% CI, 50 to 74) against severe Covid-19, and 74% (95% CI, 50 to 90) against Covid-19–related death." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2201688
Are you ashamed of how much of a sucker you are?
"65.8% of the world population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
11.8 billion doses have been administered globally, and 6.48 million are now administered each day. "
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
That reminds me - you were going to provide some data from 2022. Found any yet?
You failed at finding a single study that includes up to date 2022 fully vaccinated infection rates. LOL
I’d want to keep that hidden too if I were you.
And you have failed to come up with any study based on 2022 data.
Why do you suppose that is?
You don’t understand the science or the math or the manipulation of adjusted statistics in the propaganda you copy.
YOUR WORDS
You copy paste a headline you don’t understand.
It’s really sad.
It's science from the people most qualified to look into it. But it's "propaganda" to you. No wonder you can't find any science to support your fantasies.
Your “experts” publish fraud.
You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA this study you keep linking used old data, hid all the 2022 data and counted suspected and probable covid cases. LOL!
The lurkers are laughing at you.
Your propaganda is a laughing stock
Your unsupported opinion is noted.
You've complained about it more often, so it's actually you that keeps mentioning it, although I doubt you could actually link to it.
You hope.
The stuff from the New England Journal of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Yale Medical School? You can call it propaganda, go ahead. But who are you? Just another nameless nobody with flaky opinions.l