82% of Hospitalized Covid Infections are Vaccinated in Alberta. It’s going up each week
(media.omegacanada.win)
Comments (69)
sorted by:
MORE THAN HALF ARE TRIPPLE VACCINATED AND INFECTED WITH SEVERE COVID
Nope. Your table is for hospital admissions. The severe covid patients are in the ICUs. In the last 120 days there have been 345 unvaccinated and 483 triple vaccinated patients in the ICUs. See table 5 https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes
That's about 10% - the unvaccinated - of the population taking up 40% of the ICU beds.
Simple MATH:
The FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION
The mRNA vaccine FAILED 82% of hospitalized patients in Alberta.
“80% of serious COVID cases are triple vaccinated”, says Prof. Jacob Giris, Director of Israeli Hospital’s coronavirus ward. ”The vaccine has “no significance regarding severe illness.”
The hospitalized triple vaccinated are over represented.
85% of Canadians have had at least one shot. Of course there will be more of them with the virus. Vaccination doesn't prevent infection much since Omicron, but it still reduces the severity of the infection overall.
The vaccine reduces the severity of the infection. You have no links that say it provides 100% protection from infection.
Of course. He deals with elderly patients with many comorbidities. They are in serious trouble.
Nope. They are under-represented. Look at the graph you posted: https://omegacanada.win/p/15IEF6SFFv/82-of-hospitalized-covid-infecti/c/. The 18% of the beds occupied by unvaccinated people are coming from the 9% of the population that's unvaccinated.
the vaccine "reducing the severity" is the biggest joke in the universe.Not only does it make no sense on a classical vaccination level, it doesn't make any sense when talking abour mRNA vaccination that isn't one, and it also is an obvious tautology because you can't know what the gravity would have been.
Only to you and your fellow travelers. You know. the ones who use their common sense to argue with the people who have the education and experience to look at the worldwide evidence and do their best to figure out what's going on. Those people are the ones who sort through evidence from millions of cases and write about what they find.
You and your compadres are over there on the Group W bench with the flat earthers and the people who believe the sun goes around the earth because common sense.
Lying is wrong Tuchodi.
You say it, but you rarely provide proof, and even when you do your proof does not support your opinions.
It’s on your Regime’s own website LOL I guess CBC didn’t tweet it. So you don’t know.
Well then, it should be easy for you to back your statements up then. But you don't.
It looks like you can't.
The mRNA vaccine FAILED 82% of hospitalized patients in Alberta.
The covid vaccine did not prevent severe covid illness in 82% (!) of hospitalized vaccinated patients in Alberta, this vaccine failure puts immense strain on the healthcare system.
JUST IMAGINE IF THE VACCINE ACTUALLY WORKED: 82% of covid beds would be empty.
MORE THAN HALF OF THE HOSPITALIZED COVID INFECTIONS IN ALBERTA ARE TRIPLE VACCINATED.
The numbers in Alberta speaks for themselves.
Or do you need me to explain basic math to you again?
Please don't. You're confused enough about them already.
Only if you believe the vaccines are supposed to prevent you from ever getting the virus.
They do not prevent you from ever getting the virus.
And the rest are from the small and heavily over-represented portion of the population that is not vaccinated.
Aw bless, you don’t understand the math. So you don’t know what to say. Don’t be ashamed Tuchodi, it’s your gender studies diploma that let you down here.
The math does not change:
Maybe. You could provide a source for that statement. What's your point?
I understand that you admitted you don’t have a math or science education, but I can’t dumb it down anymore for you. Maybe the all caps will help you. Re read it really slow if you don’t understand it the first time.
Get it?
Everyone knows old people are at a higher risk from the virus. What's your point?
Exactly, i agree. The unvaccinated in the ICU are old and have high risk comorbidities.
Sadly though. The Triple vaccinated, are OVER REPRESENTED in COVID DEATHS and HOSPITALIZATION. (See Alberta stats)
.
. You’ll notice below that Tuchodi has again copy pasted her fraudulent link below:. It claims the vaccine has quote: “a 95% relative efficacy” :
This is how to break down the fraud of that “study”:
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
“We did not include studies that evaluated booster doses because very few studies on efficacy of boosters were available at the time of our meta-analysis.”
“Timeframe of study from December 2019 to November 2021”
TUCHODI IS HIDING THE FAILED BOOSTER DATA AGAIN and
HIDING THE CATASTROPHIC FULLY VACCINATED INFECTION RATES THAT OCCURRED AFTER NOVEMBER 2021, THEN PRETENDING it is “ MAY 7th 2022 “ DATA
Witness the fraud below V V V
yes, exactly, VaxedAnd makes a very good point, and it's not obvious.
The only shred of support you have provided for this statement is that someone you don't know said that someone else said it in Hebrew..
Meanwhile, in the real world: 07 May 2022 "Eighteen studies were included representing nearly 7 million individuals. ... VE against severe COVID-19 for all ages was high overall, with the level being 90% (95% CI, 87–92%) at five months or longer after being fully vaccinated. VE against severe COVID-19 was lower in individuals ≥ 65 years and those who received Ad26.COV2.S." https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
Don't listen to those "vaccines are shit" folks.
The banks got rid of their mandates. Interestingly coincided with the 1st vax injury payout.
They have the best lawyers they know what's up
1 vax is the people who stopped at one for some reason and the late shots, 2 shots are most people/ age groups, 3 shots is probably old people and the most at risk, and women. this graph makes sense according to a flu-like illness that kills mostly the elderly and within an unremarkable bracket. My theory is that vaccination is completely non correlated to ""covid" hospitalizations because these aren't really covid, and the vaxes only affect a " probability to get sick" across all illness types. So it is true that the vaxes get you sick, but this data is also useless.
The Pfizer papers that they attempted to seal for 75 years clearly state the mRNA injections created a “vaccine induced transient immunosuppression” during clinical trials and “it lowered T cells”.
The vaccines weaken your immune, your latent viruses flare up, shingles, foot hand mouth are common after mRNA vaccination now, your can’t fight off whatever bacteria or virus you are exposed to. If you add: old age + obesity + comorbidities to the vaccine induced immunosuppression, you get = hospitalization
oh absolutely.The problem is that you won't find correlation, that's how the spike was designed.
Nothing can protect the very old and the very sick from hospitalization. Canada has so few hospital and spare ICU beds per capita that we had to lose our shit and fabricate a scapegoat so that people would redirect their inevitable frustration away from the government. Most of Canada has to start scaling back ICU-requiring surgeries if more than 1 in 100,000 people become unexpectedly sick. Split people into groups of 100K. In that group there's likely to be someone who's ancient and/or catastrophically ill. Actually nix that, we assume that 9 of them are going to be that sick in normal times. We collapse when a 10th one gets that sick.
The people currently hospitalized with this are the sickest. It's just that it's only 1 in a million getting that sick now so we don't give a shit. COVID-19 isn't doing much of anything on a population scale. Other than serving as a wedge issue for the sitting party.
The irony of this is that that very sickly group OP is harping about here is probably the only group that there's a vaccination argument for. They're the ones that gum up the hospitals and the ones that are hardest to treat. The vaccines are probably having a therapeutic effect in that group and if it turns out that they're the asbestos of our generation, they're the least likely to live long enough to suffer the consequences of that.
For an overwhelming majority of people under 50, the vaccine is just smoke and mirrors because our government wouldn't have survived the lawsuits if they went ageist and forced it on the 50+ people instead of applying blunt force trauma to everyone over age 12.
While your description of the current critical care infrastructure is spot on, long term vaccine efficacy data is now in the negative. The vaccine is a failure. Tamiflu has way less side effects. Pfizer’s own phase 3 trial cited dubious vaccine efficacy, their absolute risk reduction was barely 1.5% and this was in mostly healthy subjects.
From the beginning starting March 2020 in the ICU, we were only seeing the obese, the comorbid and the elderly get admitted for Covid complications. The young and healthy did not get hospitalized in 2020. Anyone claiming the vaccine is now responsible for reducing the risk in the young and healthy in 2021 is lying. So I agree with you: smoke and mirrors.
The vaccine spike protein is a pathogen. Whether via mRNA (either in a nanoparticle or attached to adenovirus vector) it causes significant t helper cell type 2 activation. This is important for antibody class switching, but also increases ACE2 activity. Increased ACE2 creates all sorts of high risk pathologies in other wise healthy and young people. More ACE2 enzymes give the Chyna virus more ways to enter. The vaccine mRNA instructs the body to keep producing the spike that latches on to the ACE2 on mass scale. Increased ACE2 enzymes will cause increased pathologies in the young and healthy.
There is no tracking in place to count hospitalizations due to vaccine injury because increased ACE2 presentation is so wide ranging (cardiac, coag, hepatic, neuro) There is no reporting system in place to track how many ER visits took place in patients recently vaccinated. If anything they get falsely counted as unvaccinated when they present within 2-3 weeks
The triple vaccinated now have higher infection rates. The vaccine is the pathogen. Mandating it is insane.
I'm anti-mandate. Based on the pre-pandemic words of BioNTech's VP and various deep dives into lipid nanoparticle research, I'm not on board with the mRNA vaccines. The specific protein encoded by these ones is also pretty alarming.
The spike protein activates ACE-2 receptors. For some people this is catastrophic and we're seeing that.
I think we're collectively overlooking the lipid nanoparticle adjuvants though. The ones in Pfizer, at least, are slightly trophic for the adrenal glands, ovaries and eyes. Organs, that when suppressed by ongoing low key inflammation, should result in some pretty wide ranging symptoms.
An article from 2016 quotes the VP of BioNTech shit talking Moderna. https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/ "“I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech."
Nothing really has changed. mRNA protein therapies were meant for one off treatments or individualized therapeutics for old money types. BioNTech made it's name off the latter in Europe. The delivery materials are toxic. The excretion studies from the Pfizer dumps only accounted for 50% of the materials and turned up 0% of the compounds the scientists thought they'd decompose into. Moderna's EU authorization handwaves that they're using a different LNP from the one they were able to supply research on (additional tails on the one in use). But yeah, I kind of think this is going to end up being today's asbestos. The people who took repeated doses are going to get hammered by this. My gut says it will be easiest to detect as adrenal suppression which will be written off as long covid and pandemic depression by lazy general practitioners.
I do think that the % hospitalized isn't going to be reliable for much though. Without knowing the specifics of with/from covid, which strain of covid, comorbidities, and age. It might well just be that the kinds of people who tend to get 3 or 4 shots are already old and sick VS the kinds of people who opt out. There's no way to know if it's apples to apples. It could even be ADE or immunosuppression during the weeks that someone's body is responding to the last dose.
Sadly there's zero academic interest or will in Canada to investigate.
Agreed. on all.
I read this same STAT article when it came out. It’s worth noting that, Merck, Roche and Novartis abandoned all mRNA testing over the specific concern that the LNP’s was toxic, “especially if a patient has to take repeated mRNA doses over months or years.”
About vaccine induced myocarditis, and the mechanism, I wondered early on, why specifically young males? Mainly athletes or healthy young boys were getting it once vaccinated. This was troubling me the most. Immunocompetent young males never battled myocarditis during a natural infection, they were overwhelmingly asymptomatic. So why such high myocarditis incidence post vax? I assumed it was because healthy males metabolized proteins at a faster rate..
When the studies showed 12-16 males highest risk, I then assumed it is probably hormonal mechanism, Testosterone can inhibit anti-inflammatory immune cells and promote a more aggressive T helper 1 cell-type response. By contrast, estrogen has an inhibitory effects on pro-inflammatory T cells. So would help explain why healthy, high T males and athletes are at much higher risk for vaccine induced myocarditis. Antibodies to the spike glycoproteins cross-reacting with myocardial contractile proteins is also another probable mechanism.
Also about PEG. It was added to the vaccine to stabilize and protect the mRNA , yet it causes common systemic allergic reactions and even known for fatal anaphylaxis. I believe hypersensitivity to PEG is the main cause for the generalized rashes we are seeing in patients after the vax. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33011299/ The high incidence of vaccine induced anaphylaxis was discovered in test subjects during phase 3, the BioNTech papers show this. We admitted multiple anaphylaxis post vaccination last year, especially after patients first doses, kept many under observation in ER. No VAERS reporting was in place at that time.
This is shaping out to be worse than asbestos. Because of the government mandated exposure to it. And especially to children. The vaccine uses a toxin as a delivery mechanism, the cascade effects on the endo system, vascular, hepatic and neuro is unknown but the short term adverse effects are hammering the healthy and the young, already at an alarming rate.
Uh huh. And that 18% unvaccinated are coming from the 9% of the population that are unvaccinated, https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm
Got that? About one fifith of the covid hospital patients are coming from the one tenth of the population that hasn't had a shot.
Get vaccinated.
Aw and you just admitted you dont understand the meaning of “relative risk” or “absolute risk”, bless.
It’s okay, don’t be ashamed of your uneducation Tuchodi.
Did you even read the link? The median age for ALL hospitalized covid infections is 70 years old.
A triple vaccinated 70yr old has a much higher absolute risk of hospitalization compared to the younger unvaccinated.
Do you want me to dumb down the math again, or do you still not get it?
And since you've just learned about it now I'm guessing you don't know much about it.
It appears you're just learning now that old people are generally hit harder by the virus. Have you not been paying attention?
That's funny, the idea of you knowing anything about math.. You have refused to admit that unvaccinated people are at greater risk from the virus even while you're posting (finally!) information from Alberta that proves it.
~TUCHODI, 2022
Perfectly describes your thought process and contributions.
.
Read your reply to me again. You are unable to counter math or facts. YOU ARE SO DEFEATED and you have nothing to say. Lol
And what I'm guessing is that you found a new math term.
You hardly ever produce a source for your opinions and when you do - as in this case - your source does not support your opinions.
Don’t be ashamed of your uneducation Tuchodi.
You’re in a safe space here
But shit, man, vaccines were supposed to protect you from hospitalization and death. That really sucks.
That's what you thought, and you were wrong. If you still think it you're still wrong. What they do is reduce the severity of the disease.
For real, though… it would be nice if vaccinated people weren’t dying of the very thing they were vaccinated against.
There you go again, wishing for something that doesn't exist.
The best you can do is get vaccinated, stay young, and avoid comorbidities. If that's not good enough for you what other options do you think you have to better your odds?
Too bad about the vaccines, though… there was so much hope with the initial promises.
Lying is wrong Tuchodi.
The triple vaccinated are dying faster than the unvaccinated Tuchodi.
You say it, but you provide no proof.
Your chart deals only with hospitalizations, and it clearly shows that the unvaccinated - about 9% - are taking up 18% of the beds.
Aw, you’re admitting you don’t understand absolute risk.
It’s okay Tuchodi, CBC didn’t tell you and you admitted yourself you are not allowed to use critical think, and you admitted you don’t have any math background, so I understand your ignorance.
Lets ask your sock puppet u/urallfucked why the booster is harmful,
Hey, u/UrAllFucked, you admitted you’ve been refusing the booster. Why have you been refusing to follow your science?
no, it's poisson. don't get it. The unvaccinated that are sick would get sick wether or not they got it. It's not correlated because the vax is close to useless.
Then why are unvaccinated people in hospital beds and the ICUs at a higher rate?
they aren't , or more precisely you don't know why they're in ICU, and also there's the way ICUs are managed and the way they count the unvaccinated.For instance in many many cases, people are counted as unvaxed when they don't have all the doses, and then it get mixed up; that's why the 1 dose and 2 doses show weird uncorrelated results. Also you're going to have a hard time making anyone who knows mRNA decoctions to believe these make efficient vaccines, while many people working on mRNA have warned about their uncontrollable side effects.
It says right at the top of the page: "aggregate data on COVID-19 cases in Alberta". They wouldn't be counted if they didn't have covid. https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm
That is incorrect. Read the information on Table 2 at https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes. The only people counted as unvaccinated are those who have no shots and those who had their first shot less than 14 days ago. The reason for the second group is that it takes about two weeks for your body to react to the vaccine and get its defenses up to speed. https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/topics/Page17389.aspx#vaccine
What are you talking about?
No one actually working with infectious diseases has given such a warning, and compared to people with covid there are few if any patients in the ICU with side effects from vaccines. If you think that's not the case please provide some evidence.
i dont think the vaccines correlate properly with sick data, and i certainly don't think any of the data we have convincingly proves either an interesting efficiency of the vaccines or that they are safe in any length of term. There's a very visible and nefarious intent to not use well known preventative medecine like ivermectin, some notoriously bad practices were maintained, then forced, and that doesn't trigger confidence. And that's on top of the rest.
You're entitled to your opinions, of course, but you don't seem to be able to support them.
it's by design: the action of the spike protein is very drastic but difficult to prove for sure, and it also has many sites of action.The whole vaccine story has many places where things don't match, but proving anything (at the medical level, the rest is pretty obvious ) is really hard apparently.For instance one of the things that don't help is the way vaccine averse reactions are reported in many countries.And on top of those you need an autopsy, analysis etc. I use Occam's razor and in the story of the pandemy, there are so many things that don't fit satisfyingly that I don't feel safe taking it. Lots of corruption, the passes, the incredible authoritarianism, the uniformity of the response, the incredible preparedness for tech like the passes, but nothing in terms of medecine, in some place medical services being weridly reduced just before the pandemy, ihydroxychloro being banned in some country at the same moment, the fact that vaccinating during a pandemy is bad, conveniently forgotten along with many other medical facts that used to be common place. Then Trudeau telling us we're transphobic for not taking the vax. It stinks.