These kinds of statistics are self serving and skewed.
Notice that there is no category for people with one vaxx shot. They are included in the unvaxxed category. Yet studies indicate that if you have one shot and get covid you are actually at greater risk of complications. So they are inflating the numbers of complications for being unvaxxed by including those people who have been put at greater risk by getting one vaxx. Whereas if they has actually been completely unvaxxed they might have been fine.
Secondly unvaxxed includes people with 2 doses if they contract covid within 14 days of the last vaccination. Again, it is fudging the numbers. Were they put at greater risk because of the vaxx? There should be a separate category for people with 1 jab or 2 but who got covid within 14 days.
Finally, these statistics are meaningless if they do not consider over all mortality and hospitalizations. As a thought experiment, let's say that inhaling asbestos saved your from dying of covid - but you ended up dead from asbestos. These statistics ignore the complications of the vaxx and given the fact that in all jurisdictions excess mortality not due to covid is up, and given the fact that we are now dealing with Sudden Adult Death Syndrome you need to consider that even if the vaccinated experience fewer serious complications from covid they may, and in fact likely are, experiencing other problems which are completely ignored in this chart.
no category for people with one vaxx shot. They are included in the unvaxxed category.
So you want to count a jab that is too old to be effective as still good somehow? That doesn't make sense.
Yet studies indicate
What studies?
within 14 days of the last vaccination
Another case where you apparently want something to happen that doesn't. It takes time for your body to react to the vaccine. Fourteen days, apparently.
the complications of the vaxx
What complications? And more importantly: what is their overall effect compared to the damage caused by the virus?
excess mortality not due to covid is up
Fixed that for you. You seem to be assuming - and not providing any proof - that every covid death is counted. You may even be hinting that any excess deaths are caused by the vaccines. If so you'll need proof.
You are setting up straw men arguments, much like the chart you posted.
I am saying that 1 vaxx shot actually increases the risk of hospitalizations. By including one vaxx in the unvaccinated category you are polluting the data and making it meaningless. I am having trouble finding the study I refer to but in any event that the fact that the two subsets are not differentiated makes the "unvaccinated" catch all meaningless. No proper medical study would confound what are two different categories of patients. Find me a chart that breaks it down between zero doses and 1 dose and I think you will see a sharp difference.
So you want to count a jab that is too old to be effective as still good somehow? That doesn't make sense.
By your logic we should include anyone whose last vaccination is over 6 months old in the unvaxxed category since its effects wear off and even the government is now saying there is no such thing as fully vaxxed, just up-to-date, which will soon enough be 4 and more vaxxes.
What complications? And more importantly: what is their overall effect compared to the damage caused by the virus?
The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239
Yes SADS has been around, but it is becoming much more noticeable now. This is only beginning. Like smoking,asbestos and radiation not all lethal substances cause death immediately.
Even Pfizer for its Crominarty vaccine (the only fda approved version of their covid vaccine) discloses that they do not know if the vaccine causes cancer or aggravates existing cancers. In the absence of proof of safety why take this shit when your risk of death is about .02 percent.
I have had covid. I am not that young. It was a miserable 2 weeks but no serious damage. Take some vitamin d, c and zinc and you will be fine.
These kinds of statistics are self serving and skewed.
Notice that there is no category for people with one vaxx shot. They are included in the unvaxxed category. Yet studies indicate that if you have one shot and get covid you are actually at greater risk of complications. So they are inflating the numbers of complications for being unvaxxed by including those people who have been put at greater risk by getting one vaxx. Whereas if they has actually been completely unvaxxed they might have been fine.
Secondly unvaxxed includes people with 2 doses if they contract covid within 14 days of the last vaccination. Again, it is fudging the numbers. Were they put at greater risk because of the vaxx? There should be a separate category for people with 1 jab or 2 but who got covid within 14 days.
Finally, these statistics are meaningless if they do not consider over all mortality and hospitalizations. As a thought experiment, let's say that inhaling asbestos saved your from dying of covid - but you ended up dead from asbestos. These statistics ignore the complications of the vaxx and given the fact that in all jurisdictions excess mortality not due to covid is up, and given the fact that we are now dealing with Sudden Adult Death Syndrome you need to consider that even if the vaccinated experience fewer serious complications from covid they may, and in fact likely are, experiencing other problems which are completely ignored in this chart.
So you want to count a jab that is too old to be effective as still good somehow? That doesn't make sense.
What studies?
Another case where you apparently want something to happen that doesn't. It takes time for your body to react to the vaccine. Fourteen days, apparently.
What complications? And more importantly: what is their overall effect compared to the damage caused by the virus?
Fixed that for you. You seem to be assuming - and not providing any proof - that every covid death is counted. You may even be hinting that any excess deaths are caused by the vaccines. If so you'll need proof.
It's been around for decades, at least. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudden_arrhythmic_death_syndrome | https://www.sads.org/ | https://www.sads.ca/ ) If you're going to claim it's on the rise due to covid provide some legitimate proof - as in: not supermarket tabloids.
You are setting up straw men arguments, much like the chart you posted.
I am saying that 1 vaxx shot actually increases the risk of hospitalizations. By including one vaxx in the unvaccinated category you are polluting the data and making it meaningless. I am having trouble finding the study I refer to but in any event that the fact that the two subsets are not differentiated makes the "unvaccinated" catch all meaningless. No proper medical study would confound what are two different categories of patients. Find me a chart that breaks it down between zero doses and 1 dose and I think you will see a sharp difference.
By your logic we should include anyone whose last vaccination is over 6 months old in the unvaxxed category since its effects wear off and even the government is now saying there is no such thing as fully vaxxed, just up-to-date, which will soon enough be 4 and more vaxxes.
https://rupreparing.com/news/2022/6/29/moderna-vaccine-increases-myocarditis-risk-by-44-times-in-young-adults-peer-reviewed-study
The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239
More and more it turns out that the vaxxes arent that safe. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fda-sharply-limits-use-of-johnson-johnson-shot-due-to-rare-blood-clots/ar-AAWXMNi?cvid=3f49d917f9544722a70771c8c34cae60 Small consolation for the people who took the Jand J shot. And don't think that Pfizer or Moderna are better. There are huge problems with how they ran their initial studies. You'll see.
And then you have more and more studies showing that the vaxx causes dangerous complications. Each of these complications is described as rare, but cumulatively there are a lot of possible problems https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(22)00234-3/fulltext
Yes SADS has been around, but it is becoming much more noticeable now. This is only beginning. Like smoking,asbestos and radiation not all lethal substances cause death immediately.
Even Pfizer for its Crominarty vaccine (the only fda approved version of their covid vaccine) discloses that they do not know if the vaccine causes cancer or aggravates existing cancers. In the absence of proof of safety why take this shit when your risk of death is about .02 percent.
I have had covid. I am not that young. It was a miserable 2 weeks but no serious damage. Take some vitamin d, c and zinc and you will be fine.
FYI You’re debating with a car mechanic. Who relies of Politifact and Politico to submit to forced medical procedures.
Don’t sweat it when your common sense goes way over a car mechanics head.
No worries. I am just sick of the vaxx death cult. They managed to take a lot from me with their smug confidently incorrect self righteousness.