You are wrong about that. Astrazeneca and JJ both modify mrna and just through a different vector. JJ even modifies dna. Astrazeneca perhaps hasnt done as good pr as pfizer but in many countries it has been withdrawn for causing more deaths and complications than it prevents. This is after people were told it was safe and pressured to take it with vaccine mandates. You can't undo that oops.
Astrazeneca is an object less of what I am saying. It was approved. It was deemed effective and that the risks outweighed the benefit. People took it in good faith on the advice of the establishment and subject to coercion by mandates only to find out later that it was not safe and was withdrawn. What makes y ou think that the same will or should not happen to the other vaccines in time. The problem is that those who have taken it cannot undo their choice. Many have died. And this is only because the correlation between the effects and astra were to obvious to ignore. The other vaccines will have their turn. We are already starting to see the warning signs like a canary in the coal mine.
The Canadian made vaccine based on tobacco plants looks interesting but it too lacks rigorous long term statement. We have no idea what injecting plant based analogues of the spike protein actually does long term. If you go to their website you will see that they only tracked adverse effects for a few weeks of administration. So there is no way of knowing what it does long term.
You probably wouldnt eat a food product with some sort of untested novel additive, maybe made from genetically modified tobacco, yet you think it is okay to inject people and coerce them to do so.
You seem to think that rushing a vaxx to market in a few weeks is justified because of the deaths that could have happened in five years, being the usual term of testing. Then you should apply that logic to every disease. If a vaccine is being developed it is most likely for something that can kill you. But you need long term studies to determine if the cost benefit risk of the vaccine is justified. In most cases, despite being tested for the prevention of various deadly diseases such as small pox, for example, the vaccine candidate fails the testing process. It sucks but the alternative is to just kill people with vaccines. All of these safeguards were ignored in a mad rush to develop vaccines for a low mortality disease. Further review of the raw data from pfizer raises questions about the validity of even their initial claims of effectiveness and safety.
You are wrong about that. Astrazeneca and JJ both modify mrna and just through a different vector
You don't provide any support for this statement. Why should anyone believe you?
Also, your news stories are from March 2021, 16 months old, and out of-date. As of August 2021 AstraZeneca is approved for use in all the countries of the EUropean Union. See the list in Table 1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425438/
What are the effects of covid during those 5 years?
Please compare their impacts to that of covid in terms of hospitalizations and deaths. Round numbers will do.
Canada has approved 6 vaccines. Only 2 are mRNA. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/drugs-vaccines-treatments/vaccines.html
Says the car mechanic who admitted not having any science or math education.
You are wrong about that. Astrazeneca and JJ both modify mrna and just through a different vector. JJ even modifies dna. Astrazeneca perhaps hasnt done as good pr as pfizer but in many countries it has been withdrawn for causing more deaths and complications than it prevents. This is after people were told it was safe and pressured to take it with vaccine mandates. You can't undo that oops.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/15/which-countries-have-halted-use-of-astrazenecas-covid-vaccine
https://time.com/5947134/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-stopped/
Astrazeneca is an object less of what I am saying. It was approved. It was deemed effective and that the risks outweighed the benefit. People took it in good faith on the advice of the establishment and subject to coercion by mandates only to find out later that it was not safe and was withdrawn. What makes y ou think that the same will or should not happen to the other vaccines in time. The problem is that those who have taken it cannot undo their choice. Many have died. And this is only because the correlation between the effects and astra were to obvious to ignore. The other vaccines will have their turn. We are already starting to see the warning signs like a canary in the coal mine.
The Canadian made vaccine based on tobacco plants looks interesting but it too lacks rigorous long term statement. We have no idea what injecting plant based analogues of the spike protein actually does long term. If you go to their website you will see that they only tracked adverse effects for a few weeks of administration. So there is no way of knowing what it does long term.
You probably wouldnt eat a food product with some sort of untested novel additive, maybe made from genetically modified tobacco, yet you think it is okay to inject people and coerce them to do so.
You seem to think that rushing a vaxx to market in a few weeks is justified because of the deaths that could have happened in five years, being the usual term of testing. Then you should apply that logic to every disease. If a vaccine is being developed it is most likely for something that can kill you. But you need long term studies to determine if the cost benefit risk of the vaccine is justified. In most cases, despite being tested for the prevention of various deadly diseases such as small pox, for example, the vaccine candidate fails the testing process. It sucks but the alternative is to just kill people with vaccines. All of these safeguards were ignored in a mad rush to develop vaccines for a low mortality disease. Further review of the raw data from pfizer raises questions about the validity of even their initial claims of effectiveness and safety.
You don't provide any support for this statement. Why should anyone believe you?
Also, your news stories are from March 2021, 16 months old, and out of-date. As of August 2021 AstraZeneca is approved for use in all the countries of the EUropean Union. See the list in Table 1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425438/
When the FDA in the US started regulating food additives half of the ones in use were not tested. They were "generally recognized as safe". https://www.fda.gov/food/generally-recognized-safe-gras/fdas-approach-gras-provision-history-processes. Similarly there have been over 12 billion doses of covid vaccines delivered with almost no evidence of any permanent injuries - despite the rumours - and what injuries have occurred have been almost non-existent compared to the damage done by the virus. https://www.fda.gov/food/generally-recognized-safe-gras/fdas-approach-gras-provision-history-processes
If they had happened before the vaccines were released how much damage would the virus have done?