"The evidence shows that getting the vaccine has no negative impact on any of these things and it is important for protecting pregnant women and their infants.
"These new findings are of no surprise and certainly no reason to delay or avoid a COVID-19 vaccine."
What’s even more criminal is that the myocarditis and infertility were acknowledged “post market”, after the mass injections.
In other works, gullible retards like Tuchodi, are their current guinea pigs, Tuchodi is still yielding the post market long term data Pfizer doesn’t have.
Here's the quote from University of Auckland Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris in OP's link. What part of it don't you understand? Why should we listen to you instead of her?
"It is very common for women's periods to vary, particularly during stressful times and changes to a period after receipt of a vaccine has been documented many times over more than 100 years - so the phenomena is not new," she said.
"It is well established that getting even a mild cold can delay a period."
The associate professor said the findings were absolutely not a reason to delay or avoid a COVID-9 vaccine.
"The important message is it is very clear that the vaccine has no adverse effects on fertility or pregnancy."
You admitted you don’t understand science and immunology because you are uneducated. Your words.
So you rely on Politifact, Politico and Fauci to tell you what to think.
You got suckered into an experimental injection that Pfizer claimed was safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial in 0.00005% of the population and you submitted to the injection without the long term safety data.
Everyone here at Omega sees you for the gullible propagandist you are. Poorly educated and easily fooled by CBC.
You even admitted you rolled the dice after you watched CBC experts, and pharma CEO’s tell you the product they were selling was >90% effective. LOL
so you submitted to forced experimental injection shot without knowing any of the long term side effects.
The Pharma CEO after fooling you then wanted to hide for 75 years the safety data.
Imagine risking your heart to not get a cold but then getting the cold anyway.
That’s how uneducated you are, everyone here sees it. I don’t blame you for being ashamed of your low acumen.
Depends on who it's coming from, I guess. Certainly nothing you say qualifies.
I'd like everyone to note that V&C1 has no relevant training or experience in anything related to the global pandemic but they want you to ignore the people who do.
You said you are uneducated and didn’t have any math and science education. Your words. You also wrote on Omega that you were a car mechanic.
Which explains why you keep FAILING so badly at math, probability, and statistics.
You ignorantly claimed “1.4M Ontarian were occupying 1/6 of ICU beds”. Lol and to this day you still don’t have the intellect to understand why that false claim is wrong.
You posted a random medical quote on T3 claiming it had to do with male fertility. You have no idea what T3 does in the body You are a mechanic.
** You are unable to explain what ACE2 receptors do in the body or comprehend what an LNP’s is.**
You’re a car mechanic pushing an experimental medical procedure you don’t have the education level to even understand.
Youre an uneducated propagandist at best and an uneducated sick sick fuck at worst.
And I see you're still manufacturing quotes. Too bad you can't link to the original material so people can see how you're twisting it when you make those quotes up.
You admitted not having the education and you admitted not having the comprehension level to use critical think. You admitting relying on others to think for you and take medical decisions for you because you are uneducated.
And you have never claimed anything different about yourself, but despite your lack of related education /experience you believe you can see flaws in the material produced by people who are actually qualified.
First: You clearly didn't read the article closely because that statement was made by an associate professor from Auckland who was asked to comment on the study, not someone directly involved in the Washington University study. That is to say it's dishonest skew from a remote profit- and power-motivated spin doctor keen to downplay the fact that this is another side-effect that we were told a while back was a 'conspiracy theory'.
A comparable case are all those, including the corrupted corporatists at the CDC, who suggest that the Pfizer clot shots for kids are 99% effective, when in fact: ""Using a three-dose vaccine in 992 children between the ages of six months and five years, Pfizer found no statistically significant evidence of vaccine efficacy. In the subgroup of children aged six months to two years, the trial found that the vaccine could result in a 99% lower chance of infection—but that they also could have a 370% increased chance of being infected. In other words, Pfizer reported a range of vaccine efficacy so wide that no conclusion could be inferred."
Second: "Generally" 'not dangerous' does not mean it's not dangerous, and "general" has never been the standard for medicine. Drugs like Baycol, Belviq, Ergamisol, Omniflox, Posicor, etc., were taken off the market because a few people in each instance died. Their grieving families were also allowed to sue the drug companies responsible. Now, in the COVID-era, there are a shit ton of adverse effects and plenty of deaths as a result of these ineffective drugs and we're supposed to pretend the toll is acceptable.
Third: it should be cause for concern that "vaccine trial protocols do not usually monitor beyond seven days post-vaccination". If they were keeping track, I imagine the adverse effects reports would skyrocket.
Fourth: they're now openly admitting the clot shots affect sperm motility and viability, as well as women's menstrual cycles, but rule out there being any greater impact DESPITE the fact that the medium-to-long-term effects are still unknown, granted these gene therapies have only been on market in the short-term. That is akin to saying the radiation-exposed scientist hasn't had their skin slough off today, therefore they should be fine tomorrow. Lunacy.
Do you have one on where we would be if - as you seem to be advising - no one took the vaccine until at least several years of trials had taken place to determine the long-term effects of the various vaccines?
That’s the problem with people that have your flawed rationale. You imply that the two options are everybody takes the vaccine or nobody takes the vaccine.
Everybody taking the vaccine is the best option if it were to provide herd immunity, which was what was promised at the outset. But it didn’t happen and will not happen with the current covid vaccine.
There are very many experts that advocated for targeting at-risk people with the covid vaccine only. And, we knew who the at-risk people were before the covid vaccines were rolled out.
Here’s the problem with people that are unable to think - CTV News says that everybody should get the covid vaccine and they hand-pick only the experts that support their biased message to show on the TV.
From your link:
"The evidence shows that getting the vaccine has no negative impact on any of these things and it is important for protecting pregnant women and their infants.
"These new findings are of no surprise and certainly no reason to delay or avoid a COVID-19 vaccine."
Did you even read it?
What’s even more criminal is that the myocarditis and infertility were acknowledged “post market”, after the mass injections.
In other works, gullible retards like Tuchodi, are their current guinea pigs, Tuchodi is still yielding the post market long term data Pfizer doesn’t have.
This makes me happy.
Here's the quote from University of Auckland Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris in OP's link. What part of it don't you understand? Why should we listen to you instead of her?
"It is very common for women's periods to vary, particularly during stressful times and changes to a period after receipt of a vaccine has been documented many times over more than 100 years - so the phenomena is not new," she said. "It is well established that getting even a mild cold can delay a period." The associate professor said the findings were absolutely not a reason to delay or avoid a COVID-9 vaccine. "The important message is it is very clear that the vaccine has no adverse effects on fertility or pregnancy."
You’re a car mechanic. Your words.
You admitted you don’t understand science and immunology because you are uneducated. Your words.
So you rely on Politifact, Politico and Fauci to tell you what to think.
Everybody is something.
You have no relevant training or experience but for some reason you think you're qualified to claim people who do are wrong.
Very strange.
You got suckered into an experimental injection that Pfizer claimed was safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial in 0.00005% of the population and you submitted to the injection without the long term safety data.
Everyone here at Omega sees you for the gullible propagandist you are. Poorly educated and easily fooled by CBC.
You even admitted you rolled the dice after you watched CBC experts, and pharma CEO’s tell you the product they were selling was >90% effective. LOL so you submitted to forced experimental injection shot without knowing any of the long term side effects.
The Pharma CEO after fooling you then wanted to hide for 75 years the safety data.
Imagine risking your heart to not get a cold but then getting the cold anyway.
That’s how uneducated you are, everyone here sees it. I don’t blame you for being ashamed of your low acumen.
It wasn't available, was it?
As are you.
It was at the time.
The "Pharma CEO" turned over everything it was asked for.
Over six million dead, healthcare system damaged, care for "regular" illnesses unavailable.
Interesting to see how proud you are of being so wrong.
A quote isn’t science. Your low intellect is showing,
mRNA impairs male fertility. Its a fact. Just as it impaired fertility when injected in animals. (Phase 1 trials)
the mRNA impairs the reproductive function. It’s is scientific fact.
Depends on who it's coming from, I guess. Certainly nothing you say qualifies.
I'd like everyone to note that V&C1 has no relevant training or experience in anything related to the global pandemic but they want you to ignore the people who do.
You said you are uneducated and didn’t have any math and science education. Your words. You also wrote on Omega that you were a car mechanic.
Which explains why you keep FAILING so badly at math, probability, and statistics.
You ignorantly claimed “1.4M Ontarian were occupying 1/6 of ICU beds”. Lol and to this day you still don’t have the intellect to understand why that false claim is wrong.
You posted a random medical quote on T3 claiming it had to do with male fertility. You have no idea what T3 does in the body You are a mechanic.
** You are unable to explain what ACE2 receptors do in the body or comprehend what an LNP’s is.**
You’re a car mechanic pushing an experimental medical procedure you don’t have the education level to even understand.
Youre an uneducated propagandist at best and an uneducated sick sick fuck at worst.
That's funny coming from you.
And I see you're still manufacturing quotes. Too bad you can't link to the original material so people can see how you're twisting it when you make those quotes up.
You admitted not having the education and you admitted not having the comprehension level to use critical think. You admitting relying on others to think for you and take medical decisions for you because you are uneducated.
. Your words,
And you have never claimed anything different about yourself, but despite your lack of related education /experience you believe you can see flaws in the material produced by people who are actually qualified.
What flavour of delusional does that make you?
First: You clearly didn't read the article closely because that statement was made by an associate professor from Auckland who was asked to comment on the study, not someone directly involved in the Washington University study. That is to say it's dishonest skew from a remote profit- and power-motivated spin doctor keen to downplay the fact that this is another side-effect that we were told a while back was a 'conspiracy theory'.
A comparable case are all those, including the corrupted corporatists at the CDC, who suggest that the Pfizer clot shots for kids are 99% effective, when in fact: ""Using a three-dose vaccine in 992 children between the ages of six months and five years, Pfizer found no statistically significant evidence of vaccine efficacy. In the subgroup of children aged six months to two years, the trial found that the vaccine could result in a 99% lower chance of infection—but that they also could have a 370% increased chance of being infected. In other words, Pfizer reported a range of vaccine efficacy so wide that no conclusion could be inferred."
Second: "Generally" 'not dangerous' does not mean it's not dangerous, and "general" has never been the standard for medicine. Drugs like Baycol, Belviq, Ergamisol, Omniflox, Posicor, etc., were taken off the market because a few people in each instance died. Their grieving families were also allowed to sue the drug companies responsible. Now, in the COVID-era, there are a shit ton of adverse effects and plenty of deaths as a result of these ineffective drugs and we're supposed to pretend the toll is acceptable.
Third: it should be cause for concern that "vaccine trial protocols do not usually monitor beyond seven days post-vaccination". If they were keeping track, I imagine the adverse effects reports would skyrocket.
Fourth: they're now openly admitting the clot shots affect sperm motility and viability, as well as women's menstrual cycles, but rule out there being any greater impact DESPITE the fact that the medium-to-long-term effects are still unknown, granted these gene therapies have only been on market in the short-term. That is akin to saying the radiation-exposed scientist hasn't had their skin slough off today, therefore they should be fine tomorrow. Lunacy.
Your opinions are noted.
Do you have one on where we would be if - as you seem to be advising - no one took the vaccine until at least several years of trials had taken place to determine the long-term effects of the various vaccines?
I'm interested to hear it.
That’s the problem with people that have your flawed rationale. You imply that the two options are everybody takes the vaccine or nobody takes the vaccine.
Everybody taking the vaccine is the best option if it were to provide herd immunity, which was what was promised at the outset. But it didn’t happen and will not happen with the current covid vaccine.
There are very many experts that advocated for targeting at-risk people with the covid vaccine only. And, we knew who the at-risk people were before the covid vaccines were rolled out.
Here’s the problem with people that are unable to think - CTV News says that everybody should get the covid vaccine and they hand-pick only the experts that support their biased message to show on the TV.
Don’t let CTV News tell you how to think.
I missed the part where OP was recommending someone take the vaccine. Sorry. Perhaps they will expand on that in their reply.