That's too bad. That's one of the reasons I wanted to read the decision and see if the hype was warranted.
They do say that the probation condition that forced the pastor to speak a disclaimer discrediting himself every time he spoke publicly was unconstitutional, but the government conceded this point so this is probably not a very useful precedent.
That's too bad. That's one of the reasons I wanted to read the decision and see if the hype was warranted.
They do say that the probation condition that forced the pastor to speak a disclaimer discrediting himself every time he spoke publicly was unconstitutional, but the government conceded this point so this is probably not a very useful precedent.