I'm afraid I don't have any of your evidence for you, now or then. You should be able to supply some but so far you have been unable and/or refused.
Just to recap for the peanut gallery: One link in this thread compares "not fully vaccinated" children with "fully vaccinated" children and shows that in terms of hospitalizations it's better for them to be fully vaccinated. (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/stats/vbt.html#vbtadult1).
Folks, buddy here claims the paper shows damage to kids, but in the paper any kids are lumped into the 10 to 59 age group, so it's impossible to say anything specific about them. Buddy can't actually quote anything factual from the report.
Here's the weird part: he claims I provided the proof he needed - the proof he himself so far cannot supply - and then deleted it.
So top marks for humour and creativity, but zero for providing any proof for his misinformation.
Really? Then why did you delete text that showed otherwise? This question is actually rhetorical. You inadvertently wrote the answer and then deleted it after you realized what you wrote. If this is not the case, why would you delete something after I reply to it? That makes me look like the dummy unless I call you out on it.
Proof I cannot supply? Re-read my prior messages. We were both quoting text from the same link that basically said the same thing prior to you playing dumb and pretending that we were quoting something else.
Also, editing your text after it's already been replied to shows how much of a loser you really are. I always gave you the benefit of the doubt, but this is the second time that you did to me (that I know of). I understand calling people out on stupidity. I get what you like to do. But do it in an honest way or you're just a complete loser. You are a total loser.
I'm afraid I don't have any of your evidence for you, now or then. You should be able to supply some but so far you have been unable and/or refused.
Just to recap for the peanut gallery: One link in this thread compares "not fully vaccinated" children with "fully vaccinated" children and shows that in terms of hospitalizations it's better for them to be fully vaccinated. (https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/stats/vbt.html#vbtadult1).
The other link focuses on data from the first 8 months of 2021 about outcomes in a population with an age range from 10 to 59. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/All-cause-mortality-rate-vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated-in-age-group-10-59-weeks-1-38_fig4_357778435. Without a finer breakdown of age ranges it's difficult to make conclusions about children, and it says so.
You're not speaking to a dummy; just look at the text that you deleted.
Folks, buddy here claims the paper shows damage to kids, but in the paper any kids are lumped into the 10 to 59 age group, so it's impossible to say anything specific about them. Buddy can't actually quote anything factual from the report.
Here's the weird part: he claims I provided the proof he needed - the proof he himself so far cannot supply - and then deleted it.
So top marks for humour and creativity, but zero for providing any proof for his misinformation.
Really? Then why did you delete text that showed otherwise? This question is actually rhetorical. You inadvertently wrote the answer and then deleted it after you realized what you wrote. If this is not the case, why would you delete something after I reply to it? That makes me look like the dummy unless I call you out on it.
Proof I cannot supply? Re-read my prior messages. We were both quoting text from the same link that basically said the same thing prior to you playing dumb and pretending that we were quoting something else.
Also, editing your text after it's already been replied to shows how much of a loser you really are. I always gave you the benefit of the doubt, but this is the second time that you did to me (that I know of). I understand calling people out on stupidity. I get what you like to do. But do it in an honest way or you're just a complete loser. You are a total loser.
You can't produce proof.
Your story that I did and then deleted it is bizarre.