Hey Twochodes,
LET’S DISCUSS THE FACT THAT TWO EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTIONS LOWERS SPERM COUNT IN HEALTHY MALES, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT MANDATING THIS INFERTILITY.
LETS DISCUSS how there is a total absence of data on sperm count after each additional booster. Lets discuss this TwoChodes!
See folks? Another blast of copy-and-paste unsupported opinions from the same old dozen or so talking points that they recycle endlessly. Aside from name-calling, memes, and the occasional tabloid web site, that's about all V&C1 is good for.
They've always got something to say and suffer from lastworditis. They can have it.
TwoChodes, LETS DISCUSS the facts that Dr. Lourenco, Trudeau’s Director General of Health Canada, confirmed that the mRNA vaccines are as low as 20% effective.
When asked if the vaccine efficacy failure had been observed during longer more scientific clinical trials, would it have been authorized? Dr Lourenco answered: “It would not. No”.
You deflected to something completely different, as you just did again with this statement, like you have a script ingrained in you by CTV News that you automatically regurgitate.
Here's the study being talked about, which refers to 11-18 year olds in the abstract, and which contains a link to the whole preprint in a downloadable PDF: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
Anyone who wants to can find the quotes I posted in the preprint.
Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
See folks? I provide quotes from the study and a link to the whole thing so anyone who wants to can look for themselves, and DD ignores it.
Some people are incapable of discussion.
Hey TwoChodes, Let’s discuss the fact that the CDC Director lied to you April 2021: and promised you that “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15JAcTz2GX/this-is-tuchodis-expert-/c/
Why don’t you want to discuss this CDC lie?. It appears some people are incapable of discussing uncomfortable facts.
The real story folks: https://archive.ph/wQAKO
Why are you still compulsively using the word “Folks”?
Your mental illness is worsening
Cause I'm not commenting for your benefit.
Hey Twochode!
LETS DISCUSS THE FACT THAT YOUR CDC expert just CONFIRMED THAT UNVACCINATED AND VACCINATED HAVE THE SAME GUIDANCE NOW.
Got a quote or a link?
Of course not. It's V&C1. Doh!
Hey Twochodes, LET’S DISCUSS THE FACT THAT TWO EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTIONS LOWERS SPERM COUNT IN HEALTHY MALES, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT MANDATING THIS INFERTILITY.
LETS DISCUSS how there is a total absence of data on sperm count after each additional booster. Lets discuss this TwoChodes!
You left out "temporary"
THANK YOU FOR CONFIRMING THAT YOU ENDORSE GOVERNMENT MANDATED “TEMPORARY” INFERTILITY.
See folks? Another blast of copy-and-paste unsupported opinions from the same old dozen or so talking points that they recycle endlessly. Aside from name-calling, memes, and the occasional tabloid web site, that's about all V&C1 is good for.
They've always got something to say and suffer from lastworditis. They can have it.
TwoChodes, LETS DISCUSS the facts that Dr. Lourenco, Trudeau’s Director General of Health Canada, confirmed that the mRNA vaccines are as low as 20% effective.
When asked if the vaccine efficacy failure had been observed during longer more scientific clinical trials, would it have been authorized? Dr Lourenco answered: “It would not. No”.
LET’S DISCUSS THIS VACCINE FAILURE TWOCHODES.
https://omegacanada.win/p/15JAOKImJj/dr-lourenco-trudeaus-director-ge/c/
See folks? V&C1 has forgotten all about boosters.
You deflected to something completely different, as you just did again with this statement, like you have a script ingrained in you by CTV News that you automatically regurgitate.
I provide links and quotes. You say "How about a shred of proof"
It's pretty clear.
Links and quotes about 11-18 year-olds, which is what this post was discussing? No, you didn’t.
Sure did. The links were to, and the quotes were from, the study being referred to.
Here's the tweet from OP's post: https://mobile.twitter.com/ReutersFacts/status/1560276653133049857
Here's the link in that tweet: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5
Here's the study being talked about, which refers to 11-18 year olds in the abstract, and which contains a link to the whole preprint in a downloadable PDF: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
Anyone who wants to can find the quotes I posted in the preprint.
Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
Every link I supplied comes through OP's post.
The tweet he supplies does not mention 11-18 year olds. It is about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://mobile.twitter.com/ReutersFacts/status/1560276653133049857
The tweet links to a Reuters piece about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
And your supported arguments are all macro. You can’t support your fantasies, otherwise.
I'm going to suggest that peer-reviewed studies are on balance more reliable than most of the theories offered here.