Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
Yes. Not sure why you’re assuming that i would disagree. Maybe it’s because the heuristics going on in your brain are so basic that you can only group people according to your own basic stereotypes.
Link is a discussion about 11-18 year-olds. Your reply included a link to the original report and then supported your argument with macros stats for the population.
No, you did not provide the links or quotes to support your fantasy.
Every link I supplied comes through OP's post.
The tweet he supplies does not mention 11-18 year olds. It is about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://mobile.twitter.com/ReutersFacts/status/1560276653133049857
The tweet links to a Reuters piece about "A study of 301 teens in Thailand..." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5
The Reuters article contains two links to an abstract from a preprint about 301 13-18 year olds in Thailand. All the quotes I supplied are from that abstract or from the full PDF of the study, which is available from that page. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1
The study says that of the 301 students 88 had some sort of reaction, with " with all cases fully recovering within 14 days."
And your supported arguments are all macro. You can’t support your fantasies, otherwise.
I'm going to suggest that peer-reviewed studies are on balance more reliable than most of the theories offered here.
Yes. Not sure why you’re assuming that i would disagree. Maybe it’s because the heuristics going on in your brain are so basic that you can only group people according to your own basic stereotypes.